Administrative Decisions Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: XA v NSW Trustee and Guardian (External) [2011] NSWADTAP 20 Hearing dates: 4 March 2011 Decision date: 29 April 2011 Before: Magistrate N Hennessy, Deputy President
Ms S Leal, Judicial Member
Dr B Field, Non-judicial MemberDecision: 1. XA's application for leave for the appeal to proceed on grounds other than a question of law is refused.
2. The Guardianship Tribunal's decision to allow the guardianship order in relation to XB to lapse is affirmed.
3. The Guardianship Tribunal's decision to confirm the appointment of the NSW Trustee and Guardian as XB's financial manager is affirmed.
Catchwords: APPEAL - lapsing or revocation of guardianship order - test to be applied - no question of law Legislation Cited: Guardianship Act 1987
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997Cases Cited: Holt and Anor v Protective Commissioner (1993) 31 NSWLR 227
IF v IG & Ors [2004] NSWADTAP 3
Ormwave Pty Ltd v Smith [2007] NSWCA 210; 5 DDCR 180
Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139Category: Principal judgment Parties: XA (Appellant)
XB (First Respondent)
NSW Trustee and Guardian (Second Respondent)
Guardianship Tribunal (Decision Maker)Representation: XA (Appellant - in person)
Dr Frank Ainsworth (Guardian ad litem for First Respondent)
NSW Trustee and Guardian (No Appearance)
Guardianship Tribunal (Decision Maker - Ms E Cho)
File Number(s): 108011 Decision under appeal
- Date of Decision:
- 2010-09-24 00:00:00
- Before:
- Ms C Fourgere
Ms S Taylor
Ms Le Manns- File Number(s):
- File No. C/33625
Matter No 2010/3742
reasons
Introduction
XB, who has an intellectual disability and schizophrenia, lives in supported accommodation in the Newcastle area. The accommodation is operated by New Horizons Enterprises Ltd. XB's brother, XA, has appealed against two decisions of the Guardianship Tribunal. The first decision was to allow a previous guardianship order appointing the Public Guardian (now the NSW Trustee and Guardian) as XB's guardian, to lapse. XA wanted the guardianship order to continue and for him to be appointed as his brother's guardian to make substitute decisions in relation to health care and medical treatment. The second decision was to confirm a previous financial management order appointing the NSW Trustee and Guardian as XB's financial manager. XA had applied for a review of that order requesting that he replace the NSW Trustee and Guardian as his brother's financial manager.
At the hearing the Guardianship Tribunal dealt with four applications; three relating to the guardianship order and one relating to the financial management order. Those applications were:
(1) an application by XA to review the guardianship order;
(2) an application by the Public Guardian to review the guardianship order;
(3) the statutory review of the guardianship order due in September 2011, which was brought forward;
(4) an application from XA to review the financial management order made for XB on 10 May 2006 and to replace the NSW Trustee with XA as the manager of XB's estate.
XA appealed against the Guardianship Tribunal's decisions on questions of law. In addition,…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read XA v NSW Trustee and Guardian (External) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2011] NSWADTAP 20
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the Guardianship Tribunal had correctly applied the law in allowing the guardianship order to lapse and in appointing the NSW Trustee and Guardian as XB's financial manager. The court held that the test to be applied in determining whether a guardianship order should lapse or be revoked is whether the person subject to the order has recovered or is likely to recover the capacity to manage their own affairs. The court found that the Guardianship Tribunal had correctly applied this test and had not erred in its decision to allow the guardianship order to lapse.
The court also found that the Guardianship Tribunal had correctly appointed the NSW Trustee and Guardian as XB's financial manager. The court held that the Guardianship Tribunal was required to consider the best interests of XB in making its decision and that the appointment of the NSW Trustee and Guardian was in the best interests of XB. The court found that the Guardianship Tribunal had correctly considered the relevant factors in making its decision and had not erred in appointing the NSW Trustee and Guardian as XB's financial manager.
The court dismissed XA's application for leave for the appeal to proceed on grounds other than a question of law and affirmed the Guardianship Tribunal's decision to allow the guardianship order to lapse and to confirm the appointment of the NSW Trustee and Guardian as XB's financial manager.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. XA's application for leave for the appeal to proceed on grounds other than a question of law is refused.
2. The Guardianship Tribunal's decision to allow the guardianship order in relation to XB to lapse is affirmed.
3. The Guardianship Tribunal's decision to confirm the appointment of the NSW Trustee and Guardian as XB's financial manager is affirmed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.