NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: WZL [2022] NSWCATGD 4 Hearing dates: 13 April 2022 Date of orders: 13 April 2022 Decision date: 13 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Guardianship Division Before: A Britton, Deputy President
Dr F Duffy, Senior Member (Professional)
I Ferreira, General Member (Community)Decision: Guardianship
1. A guardianship order is made for WZL.
2. The Public Guardian is appointed as the guardian.
3. This is a continuing guardianship order for a period of 12 months from 13 April 2022.
4. This is a limited guardianship order giving the guardian(s) custody of WZL to the extent necessary to carry out the functions below.
FUNCTIONS:
5. The guardian has the following functions:
a) Access
To decide what access WZL has to others and the conditions of access.
b) Accommodation
To decide where WZL may reside.
c) Services
To make decisions about services to be provided to WZL.
CONDITION:
6. The condition of this order is:
a) Standard Condition
In exercising this role the guardian shall take all reasonable steps to bring WZL to an understanding of the issues and to obtain and consider her views before making significant decisions.
Financial Management
1. The estate of WZL is subject to management under the NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 (NSW).
2. The management of the estate of WZL is committed to the NSW Trustee and Guardian.
Catchwords: GUARDIANSHIP – application for a guardianship order – whether a guardianship order should be made, and what order should be made – subject person is of advanced age – subject person has dementia and cognitive impairment – subject person made and then revoked successive enduring guardian and enduring power of attorney appointments – significant conflict within subject person’s close family – need for independent decision-maker in relation to access decisions – proposed guardians not suitable to be appointed – Public Guardian appointed – order made.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – application for a financial management order – whether subject person is incapable of managing their own affairs – best interests of the subject person that an order be made – no private person suitable to be appointed – NSW Trustee and Guardian appointed – order made.
Legislation Cited: Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), ss
3(1)-(2), 4, 4(f), 14(1)-(2), 15(3), 17(1), 17(1)(c), 25G, 25M
Cases Cited: Application by AMAM; Re SAM [2011] NSWSC 503
M v M [2013] NSWSC 1495
Texts Cited: None cited.
Category: Principal judgment Parties: 002: Guardianship Application
WZL (the person)
TQW (applicant)
EBL (enduring guardian)
Public Guardian003: Financial Management Application
WZL (the person)
TQW (applicant)
EBL (attorney)
NSW Trustee and GuardianRepresentation: I Reed, separate representative (WZL)
A Stewart, legal representative (TQW)
File Number(s): NCAT 2020/00283171 Publication restriction: Decisions of the Guardianship Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal have been anonymised to remove any information that may identify any person involved in the Tribunal’s…
Continue reading WZL
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- WZL [2022] NSWCATGD 4
- Case
- [2022] NSWCATGD 4
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue for the court was to determine the appropriate level of guardianship and financial management needed for WZL. The court had to consider the subject person's cognitive condition, the necessity for an independent decision-maker, and the suitability of potential guardians. It was established that WZL had revoked her enduring guardian and enduring power of attorney appointments due to family conflicts, leaving no private individual suitable for the role. Given the circumstances, the court needed to decide whether the Public Guardian should be appointed and what functions the order should include.
The court found that WZL’s condition and the family dynamics necessitated a guardianship order to ensure her welfare. The Public Guardian was deemed suitable due to the unsuitability of any private individual, and a limited guardianship order was appropriate to address specific areas such as access, accommodation, and services. The court also concluded that a financial management order was necessary as WZL was incapable of managing her own affairs, and the NSW Trustee and Guardian was the appropriate entity for this role. The court issued a continuing guardianship order for twelve months and appointed the Public Guardian with specified functions, while committing WZL's estate management to the NSW Trustee and Guardian.
Orders
Orders of the court
Guardianship
1. A guardianship order is made for WZL.
2. The Public Guardian is appointed as the guardian.
3. This is a continuing guardianship order for a period of 12 months from 13 April 2022.
4. This is a limited guardianship order giving the guardian(s) custody of WZL to the extent necessary to carry out the functions below.
FUNCTIONS:
5. The guardian has the following functions:
a) Access
To decide what access WZL has to others and the conditions of access.
b) Accommodation
To decide where WZL may reside.
c) Services
To make decisions about services to be provided to WZL.
CONDITION:
6. The condition of this order is:
a) Standard Condition
In exercising this role the guardian shall take all reasonable steps to bring WZL to an understanding of the issues and to obtain and consider her views before making significant decisions.
Financial Management
1. The estate of WZL is subject to management under the NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 (NSW).
2. The management of the estate of WZL is committed to the NSW Trustee and Guardian.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.