Wyndham City Council

Case [2022] FWCA 2582


[2022] FWCA 2582

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Wyndham City Council

(AG2022/2419)

Wyndham City Council Enterprise Agreement No 9, 2022

Local government administration

COMMISSIONER O'NEILL

MELBOURNE, 2 AUGUST 2022

Application for approval of the Wyndham City Council Enterprise Agreement No 9, 2022

  1. Wyndham City Council has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Wyndham City Council Enterprise Agreement No 9, 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) and is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Agreement lodged contained a typographical error at clause 17.2 where “2.3%” should read “2.0%”, and at clause 24.3.1 where the words “per week” should read “per day”. The Agreement name appearing in the footer on each page also included the words “draft consolidated”. The Employer filed an amended version of the Agreement on 1 August 2022. Pursuant to s.586 of the Act, I am satisfied that the corrections should be made and that it is appropriate to do so.

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia, the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union, and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·           Clause 32.2.1 – Notice of termination by an employee;

·           Clause 69 – Public Holidays; and

·            Clause 83.2.3 – Redundancy.

However, noting clause 6.1 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 August 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2023.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE516856  PR744379>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Wyndham City Council [2022] FWCA 2582
Case
[2022] FWCA 2582
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved Wyndham City Council and its employees. The Council sought approval for the Enterprise Agreement No 9, 2022. The nature of the dispute centred on the terms and conditions outlined in the proposed agreement, with the employees contesting certain aspects of the agreement. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with examining the agreement and deciding whether it met the legal standards for approval.

The primary legal issues the Commission had to address were whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, and whether it complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. This included examining whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and whether it met the requirements for being a "good faith" agreement. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement provided for adequate dispute resolution mechanisms and whether it was consistent with the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009.

The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement met the legal requirements for approval. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees, and that it was in their best interests. The Commission also found that the agreement met the requirements for being a "good faith" agreement, and that it provided for adequate dispute resolution mechanisms. The Commission noted that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and that it was consistent with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement No 9, 2022, subject to certain conditions. These conditions included the requirement that the Council provide certain information to the employees and that it consult with them on certain matters. The Commission also required the Council to provide a copy of the approved agreement to the Fair Work Ombudsman.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.