Wyatt & Wyatt

Case [2023] FedCFamC1A 222


FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

(DIVISION 1) APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Wyatt & Wyatt [2023] FedCFamC1A 222

Appeal from: Wyatt and Wyatt [2023] FCWA 206
Appeal number: NAA 265 of 2023
File number: PTW 9466 of 2021
Judgment of: ALDRIDGE, HARTNETT & RIETHMULLER JJ
Date of judgment: 7 December 2023
Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – APPEAL – LEAVE TO APPEAL – Where the parties entered into a contract to purchase property – Where the trial judge ordered the parties to complete the purchase – Dispute as to one of the consequential orders for the mechanisms of repaying the mortgage – Orders required repayments from a re-draw account – Amount in dispute no more than seven per cent of the assets of the parties – Wife conceded husband will receive 40 per cent of the assets of the parties – More than sufficient assets to make any appropriate adjustments when making final orders – No substantial injustice if leave refused – Leave refused – Appeal dismissed – Applicant to pay the respondent’s costs.
Legislation:

Federal Circuit and Family Court ofAustralia Act 2021 (Cth) s 28

Federal Court and Federal Circuit and Family Court Regulations 2022 (Cth) reg 4.02

Cases cited:

Jeffries & Post [2021] FedCFamC1A 92

Medlow & Medlow (2016) FLC 93-692; [2016] FamCAFC 34

Perica & Perica [2022] FedCFamC1A 184

Number of paragraphs: 16
Date of hearing: 7 December 2023
Place: Sydney
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Dowding SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Kerr Fels Lawyers
Solicitor for the Respondent: Klimek Wijay Family Lawyers

ORDERS

NAA 265 of 2023
PTW 9466 of 2021

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DIVISION 1 APPELLATE JURISDICTION

BETWEEN:

MS WYATT

Applicant

AND:

MR WYATT

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

ALDRIDGE, HARTNETT & RIETHMULLER JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

7 DECEMBER 2023

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Leave to appeal is refused.

2.The appeal is dismissed.

3.The applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal fixed in the sum of $8,369.71.

Note:   The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Wyatt & Wyatt has been approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

EX TEMPORE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

RIETHMULLER J:

  1. The applicant wife applies for leave to appeal against an interlocutory order made by the primary judge concerning the financial arrangements required to enable the parties to complete a contract for the purchase of an apartment off the plan. The parties entered into a contract to purchase the apartment in 2019 and paid a 10 per cent deposit of $120,000. In April…

Continue reading Wyatt & Wyatt

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Wyatt & Wyatt [2023] FedCFamC1A 222
Case
[2023] FedCFamC1A 222
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Appellate Division) considered an appeal by Ms Wyatt against a decision made in the primary jurisdiction. The case arose from a contractual dispute between Ms Wyatt and Mr Wyatt over the purchase of a property. The trial judge had ordered the parties to complete the purchase, but a dispute arose regarding one of the consequential orders, specifically the mechanisms for repaying the mortgage. The court was required to determine whether Ms Wyatt should be granted leave to appeal the primary judge's decision and, if so, whether the appeal should succeed.

The court focused on the substantial merits of the appeal and the necessity of granting leave. It was noted that the amount in dispute was only seven per cent of the parties' total assets, and Ms Wyatt had conceded that Mr Wyatt would receive 40 per cent of those assets. Given the ample assets available, the court found there was no substantial injustice in refusing leave to appeal. The court held that the appeal was unlikely to succeed because the primary judge's decision was reasonable and there was no error of law. The court also considered the financial implications for Ms Wyatt if she were to proceed with the appeal.

Consequently, the court refused leave to appeal and dismissed the appeal. It ordered that Ms Wyatt pay Mr Wyatt's costs of the appeal, fixed at $8,369.71. The court's decision was final, with no further avenues for appeal available to Ms Wyatt.

Orders

Orders of the court

NAA 265 of 2023

PTW 9466 of 2021

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

DIVISION 1 APPELLATE JURISDICTION

BETWEEN:

MS WYATT

Applicant

AND:

MR WYATT

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

ALDRIDGE, HARTNETT & RIETHMULLER JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

7 DECEMBER 2023

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. Leave to appeal is refused.

2. The appeal is dismissed.

3. The applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal fixed in the sum of $8,369.71.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.