WWR

Case [2018] QCAT 463


QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


CITATION:

WWR [2018] QCAT 463

PARTIES:

In applications about matters concerning WWR

APPLICATION NO/S: GAA5592-18; GAA5594-18; GAA5595-18;
GAA70621-18

MATTER TYPE:

Guardianship and administration matters for adults

DELIVERED ON:

16 October 2018 (delivered ex tempore)

HEARING DATE:

16 October 2018

HEARD AT:

Mackay

DECISION OF:

Member Gardiner

ORDERS:

1.   The application for advice, directions and recommendations for WWR is dismissed.

2. The Tribunal orders that pursuant to s 108 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld) publication of information about the following advices is prohibited:

(a)    Advice from Counsel to the Official Solicitor of the Public Trustee of Queensland dated 10 November 2017; and

(b)    Advice of the Official Solicitor of the Public Trustee to the Public Trustee of Queensland dated 8 March 2018.

3. The Tribunal orders that pursuant to s 109 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld) the following information/documents are confidential and must not be disclosed:

(a)    Advice from Counsel to the Official Solicitor of the Public Trustee of Queensland dated 10 November 2017; and

(b)    Advice of the Official Solicitor of the Public Trustee to the Public Trustee of Queensland dated 8 March 2018.

4.   The application for a closure order for WWR is dismissed.

CATCHWORDS:

HEALTH LAW – GUARDIANSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF PROPERTY OF PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED CAPACITY – ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – where administrator sought advice, directions or recommendations – where daughter had used substantial monies of person for her own purposes – where some monies had been recovered – where daughter had no assets to recover further monies – whether advice, directions or recommendations should be made

Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld), s 107,
s 108, s 109, s 130, s 138

APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:

Public Guardian:

S Gable

Public Trustee:

T Whittaker, S Pedersen          

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. Member Gardiner: Four applications are before the Tribunal today, the first being an application for advice, directions and recommendations under section 138 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld), concerning the Public Trustee’s decision not to proceed against the daughter of the adult WWR who has appeared to have fraudulently asset-stripped – because that is effectively what it is – her father, of a substantial amount of money.

  2. Over a period of time, from a number of sources, WWR’s daughter has used funds for what appears to be totally her own benefit, often taken out in places where gambling occurs and often taken out with no apparent recompense back to WWR for any particular bill.  On one occasion, even her daughter made a withdrawal, using internet processes, after the Public Trustee was appointed WWR’s administrator instead of WWR’s daughter and after these misappropriations of funds came to the attention of the Tribunal. 

  3. To the credit of the Public Trustee, they were able to retrieve about $20,000 that had been paid by a bank after the bank had been notified that the Public Trustee was the administrator for WWR.  It would appear the bank…

Continue reading WWR

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
WWR [2018] QCAT 463
Case
[2018] QCAT 463
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of WWR, the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal was presented with an application for advice, directions, or recommendations concerning the financial management of a person under a guardianship order. The application arose from allegations that the daughter of the person, who was appointed as the administrator of the person's estate, had misused a substantial portion of the person's funds for her personal benefit. Although some of the misused funds had been recovered, it was established that the daughter had no remaining assets from which further monies could be reclaimed.

The primary legal issues the Tribunal needed to resolve were whether advice, directions, or recommendations should be provided to the daughter regarding the misuse of funds and the management of the estate. Additionally, the Tribunal considered whether a closure order should be made to conclude the administration of the estate, given the circumstances of the misuse and the recovery of some funds.

The Tribunal dismissed the application for advice, directions, and recommendations, concluding that the misuse of funds was sufficiently addressed by the recovery of some monies and the daughter's lack of further assets. The Tribunal also rejected the application for a closure order, determining that the administration of the estate should continue to allow for the ongoing management of the person's assets. Additionally, the Tribunal issued orders prohibiting the publication of certain legal advice and mandating the confidentiality of specific documents related to the case.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The application for advice, directions and recommendations for WWR is dismissed.

2. The Tribunal orders that pursuant to s 108 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld) publication of information about the following advices is prohibited:

(a) Advice from Counsel to the Official Solicitor of the Public Trustee of Queensland dated 10 November 2017; and

(b) Advice of the Official Solicitor of the Public Trustee to the Public Trustee of Queensland dated 8 March 2018.

3. The Tribunal orders that pursuant to s 109 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 (Qld) the following information/documents are confidential and must not be disclosed:

(a) Advice from Counsel to the Official Solicitor of the Public Trustee of Queensland dated 10 November 2017; and

(b) Advice of the Official Solicitor of the Public Trustee to the Public Trustee of Queensland dated 8 March 2018.

4. The application for a closure order for WWR is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.