Worrell v Tantner-Issitch

[1999] FCA 1297

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Worrell v Tantner-Issitch [1999] FCA 1297

SIGFRIED TANTNER  EX PARTE: IVOR WORRELL v LUDMILLA ISSITCH aka LUDMILLA TANTNER-ISSITCH

DOWSETT J

14 SEPTEMBER 1999
BRISBANE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY	QG 7007 OF 1996

BETWEEN:

SIGFRIED TANTNER
Bankrupt

EX PARTE:  IVOR WORRELL
Applicant

AND:

LUDMILLA ISSITCH aka LUDMILLA TANTNER-ISSITCH
Respondent

JUDGE:

DOWSETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

14 SEPTEMBER 1999

WHERE MADE:

BRISBANE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY	QG 7007 OF 1996

BETWEEN:

SIGFRIED TANTNER
Bankrupt

EX PARTE:  IVOR WORRELL
Applicant

AND:

LUDMILLA ISSITCH aka LUDMILLA TANTNER-ISSITCH
Respondent

JUDGE:	DOWSETT J
DATE:	14 SEPTEMBER 1999
PLACE:	BRISBANE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1. I would not normally entertain an application for interrogatories at this late stage, but these are proceedings in bankruptcy, and it does seem to me that they have been conducted in a quite singular way on both sides.  I am of the view that the conduct of the trial is likely to be very much expedited if the interrogatories are answered.  In those circumstances I think that it is probably in the interests of the administration of justice that they be answered.

I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett.

Associate:

Dated:             15 September 1999

Counsel for the Applicant:	Mr M Martin
Solicitor for the Applicant:	Baker Johnson
Counsel for the Respondent:	Mr P McQuade
Solicitor for the Respondent:	Andrew P Abaza
Date of Hearing:	14 September 1999
Date of Judgment:	14 September 1999