Woolworths (Qld) Pty Ltd v Berry-Porter
Case
•
[2002] QSC 360
•30 October 2002
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Woolworths (Qld) Pty Ltd v Berry-Porter [2002] QSC 360
[2002] QSC 360
30 October 2002
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Woolworths (Qld) Pty Ltd sought an order for the respondent, Berry-Porter, to be examined by specialists nominated by the applicant under the WorkCover Queensland Act 1996. The application arose in the context of a workers’ compensation claim, where Berry-Porter had obtained medical reports during the time in which the compensation claim was being processed. Subsequently, Berry-Porter elected to claim damages under the Act. Woolworths (Qld) Pty Ltd nominated a panel of specialists to independently examine Berry-Porter, and sought an order for Berry-Porter to choose a specialist from each panel to examine him on behalf of Woolworths (Qld) Pty Ltd. The central issue was whether Woolworths (Qld) Pty Ltd had an unqualified right to an examination of Berry-Porter by specialists unaffected by previous medical examinations.
The court found that Woolworths (Qld) Pty Ltd did not have an unqualified right to an examination of Berry-Porter by specialists unaffected by previous medical examinations. The court held that the decision to seek a further medical examination by a specialist must be made on the basis of the merits of the case. The court held that the application was an attempt to circumvent the statutory scheme and was an abuse of process. The court found that Woolworths (Qld) Pty Ltd had not established that a further examination was necessary, and that the application should be dismissed.
The court dismissed the application and made no orders for costs.
The court found that Woolworths (Qld) Pty Ltd did not have an unqualified right to an examination of Berry-Porter by specialists unaffected by previous medical examinations. The court held that the decision to seek a further medical examination by a specialist must be made on the basis of the merits of the case. The court held that the application was an attempt to circumvent the statutory scheme and was an abuse of process. The court found that Woolworths (Qld) Pty Ltd had not established that a further examination was necessary, and that the application should be dismissed.
The court dismissed the application and made no orders for costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Workers' Compensation Law
Legal Concepts
-
Assessment and Amount of Compensation
-
Independent Medical Examinations
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Hinrichsen v Glencore Queensland Limited [2019] QSC 112
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Hinrichsen v Glencore Queensland Limited
[2019] QSC 112
Jackson v State of Queensland
[2005] QSC 161
Moore v Stage Coach Qld Pty Ltd
[2004] QSC 3
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0
Muller v Nebo Shire Council
[2002] QSC 313
Muller v Nebo Shire Council
[2002] QSC 313