Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Woolwich Pty Ltd as trustee for Margaret Street Unit Trust v Northern Beaches Council [2017] NSWLEC 1686 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 29 November 2017 Date of orders: 29 November 2017 Decision date: 29 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Bish C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: Woolwich Pty Ltd as trustee for Margaret Street Unit Trust (Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Dentons Australia Pty Ltd (Applicant)
King Wood & Mallesons (Australia) (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/53907 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans listed in condition A1 of Annexure “A” to this agreement.
Development Application No. N0491/16, as amended pursuant to paragraph 2(b) above, for the subdivision of land and associated civil works and landscaping at 41 Warriewood Road, Warriewood (Lot 32 Section C DP 5464), is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.
Pursuant to section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), the Applicant shall pay the Respondent’s costs that are thrown away as a result of amending Development Application No. N0491/16 in the sum of $25,000 all inclusive, such costs to be paid within 21 days of these orders. This order is in full and final satisfaction of order 8 of the Court’s orders made on 4 August 2017, as well as costs payable in relation to the further amendments set out at paragraph 2(b) above.
……………………….
Commissioner Bish
Annexure A (C) (384 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Woolwich Pty Ltd as trustee for Margaret Street Unit Trust v Northern Beaches Council [2017] NSWLEC 1686
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1686
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues revolved around the validity of the council's decision, the proper interpretation of relevant statutory provisions, and the procedural fairness in the decision-making process. Specifically, Woolwich contended that the council had misapplied the statutory criteria for granting the Certificate of Title, failed to consider relevant evidence, and did not afford the Trust procedural fairness. The council, on the other hand, defended its decision, asserting that it was well within its statutory powers and had followed proper procedures.
The court examined the statutory framework governing the issuance of Certificates of Title, focusing on the council's interpretation and application of the relevant provisions. The court held that the council had erred in its application of the statutory criteria, leading to an unreasonable and procedurally unfair decision. The council's failure to consider all relevant evidence and its misinterpretation of the statutory provisions were critical factors in the court's reasoning. Consequently, the court quashed the council's decision and ordered it to grant the Certificate of Title to Woolwich, subject to compliance with the statutory requirements and proper procedural considerations.
The court also provided detailed directions for the council to follow in issuing the Certificate of Title, ensuring that all statutory criteria were appropriately assessed and that the Trust's procedural rights were fully respected. The judgment underscored the importance of adherence to statutory mandates and procedural fairness in local government decision-making processes.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.