M & J Rawlings Builders And Contractors v Rawlings
[2010] VSCA 306
Citation 1
…subjectively appreciate that the injury is serious until after the relevant date is not necessarily determinative.”[9] [7] [2010] VSCA 306 [8] The date on which the respondent made application under s.135A(2B) of the Act [9] Rawlings ( op cit ), at paragraph 36; see also Papercorp Pty Ltd v Nicolaou; Howden v Ans…
Smith v Canberra Press Pty Ltd
[2009] VSCA 200
Citation 2
(Para 8)
…006] VSCA 143, [6]; AEP Industries Australia Pty Ltd v Mahmoud (2007) 17 VR 144 at page 150; Smith v Canberra Press Pty Ltd [2009] VSCA 200 at [8]…
AEP Industries Australia Pty Ltd v Mahmoud
[2007] VSCA 203
Citation 3
…so Papercorp Pty Ltd v Nicolaou; Howden v Ansett Australia [2006] VSCA 143, [6]; AEP Industries Australia Pty Ltd v Mahmoud (2007) 17 VR 144 at page 150; Smith v Canberra Press Pty Ltd [2009] VSCA 200 at [8]…
Papercorp Pty Ltd v Nicolaou
[2006] VSCA 143
Citation 4
…A(2B) of the Act [9] Rawlings ( op cit ), at paragraph 36; see also Papercorp Pty Ltd v Nicolaou; Howden v Ansett Australia [2006] VSCA 143, [6]; AEP Industries Australia Pty Ltd v Mahmoud (2007) 17 VR 144 at page 150; Smith v Canberra Press Pty Ltd [2009] VSCA 200 at [8]…
Barlow v Hollis
[2000] VSCA 26
Citation 5
…cision of Humphries v Poljak ,[4] where a majority of the then Full Court of Victoria stated: [3] See s.135A(1) of the Act [4] [1992] 2 VR 129. Although the test in Humphries dealt with s.93 of the Transport Accident Act , the same test has been held to be applicable to applications for “serious injury” und…