| [2019] FWCA 3527 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
WJ & KL Williams Pty Ltd
(AG2019/1300)
WJ AND KL WILLIAMS PTY LTD AND AMWU METAL ENGINEERING ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 2017-2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 22 MAY 2019 |
Application for approval of the WJ and KL Williams Pty Ltd and AMWU Metal Engineering On-Site Construction Agreement 2017-2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the WJ and KL Williams Pty Ltd and AMWU Metal Engineering On-Site Construction Agreement 2017-2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by WJ & KL Williams Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 29 May 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE503555 PR708558>
- AGLC
- WJ & KL Williams Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 3527
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 3527
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved whether the proposed agreement met the criteria for approval under section 232 of the Fair Work Act. These included whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, whether it was negotiated in good faith, and whether it complied with the procedural fairness requirements. Additionally, the Commission had to determine whether the proposed agreement contained mandatory terms that were not prohibited by the Act.
The Commission examined the terms of the proposed agreement and the process by which it was negotiated. It found that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, considering the specific circumstances of the parties. The Commission also concluded that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and that the procedural fairness requirements were met. Regarding the mandatory terms, the Commission determined that the proposed agreement did not contain any terms that were prohibited by the Act. Consequently, the Commission approved the proposed agreement, finding it to be fair and reasonable. The approval was subject to specific conditions to ensure ongoing compliance with the Fair Work Act and to facilitate effective implementation of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.