FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wise on behalf of the Kurungal People v State of Western Australia
[2014] FCA 250
Citation: Wise on behalf of the Kurungal People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 250 Parties: BUTCHER WISE AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE KURUNGAL PEOPLE v STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS File number: WAD 6217 of 1998 Judge: GILMOUR J Date of judgment: 19 February 2014 Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – parties - application for removal Date of hearing: 19 February 2014 Place: Perth Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 1 Counsel for the Applicant: Ms J Cole Solicitor for the Applicant: Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corporation Counsel for the State of Western Australia: No appearance Solicitor for the State of Western Australia: State Solicitor's Office Counsel for Telstra Corporation Limited: No appearance Solicitor for Telstra Corporation Limited: Herbert Smith Freehills
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
WAD 6217 of 1998
BETWEEN: BUTCHER WISE AND OTHERSON BEHALF OF THE KURUNGAL PEOPLE
ApplicantAND: STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS
Respondents
JUDGE:
GILMOUR J
DATE OF ORDER:
19 FEBRUARY 2014
WHERE MADE:
PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The respondent, Kimberley Oil NL (ACN 075 760 655), be removed as a party to these proceedings.
2.The respondent, Western Metals Zinc NL (ACN 063 635 076), be removed as a party to these proceedings.
3.There be no order as to costs.
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
WAD 6217 of 1998
BETWEEN: BUTCHER WISE AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE KURUNGAL PEOPLE
ApplicantAND: STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS
Respondents
JUDGE:
GILMOUR J
DATE:
19 FEBRUARY 2014
PLACE:
PERTH
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application by the applicant for orders that the respondents, Kimberley Oil NL and Western Metals Zinc NL, be removed as parties to these proceedings. The application is supported by affidavits of Simon Charles Blackshield, each affirmed on 7 and 31 January 2014 respectively. I have read the detailed written submissions of the applicant which I accept. I am satisfied that the orders should be made as sought in the interlocutory application.
I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Gilmour. Associate:
Dated: 26 March 2014
- AGLC
- Wise on behalf of the Kurungal People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 250
- Case
- [2014] FCA 250
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Justice Gilmour accepted the applicants' submissions and found that the companies had no legitimate interest in the proceedings. The Court was satisfied that there were no valid grounds for the companies to remain as parties in the native title claim. The Court determined that removing the companies as parties was appropriate and ordered their removal from the proceedings. Justice Gilmour certified that the reasons for the judgment were correctly transcribed. The Court did not make any orders regarding costs. This decision was a significant step in the native title claim process, clarifying the parties involved and streamlining the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.