Wise on behalf of the Kurungal People v State of Western Australia

Case [2014] FCA 250


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Wise on behalf of the Kurungal People v State of Western Australia
[2014] FCA 250  

Citation: Wise on behalf of the Kurungal People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 250
Parties: BUTCHER WISE AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE KURUNGAL PEOPLE v STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS
File number: WAD 6217 of 1998
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 19 February 2014
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – parties - application for removal
Date of hearing: 19 February 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 1
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms J Cole
Solicitor for the Applicant: Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corporation
Counsel for the State of Western Australia: No appearance
Solicitor for the State of Western Australia: State Solicitor's Office
Counsel for Telstra Corporation Limited: No appearance
Solicitor for Telstra Corporation Limited: Herbert Smith Freehills

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

WAD 6217 of 1998

BETWEEN:

BUTCHER WISE AND OTHERSON BEHALF OF THE KURUNGAL PEOPLE
Applicant

AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS
Respondents

JUDGE:

GILMOUR J

DATE OF ORDER:

19 FEBRUARY 2014

WHERE MADE:

PERTH

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The respondent, Kimberley Oil NL (ACN 075 760 655), be removed as a party to these proceedings.

2.The respondent, Western Metals Zinc NL (ACN 063 635 076), be removed as a party to these proceedings.

3.There be no order as to costs.  

Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

WAD 6217 of 1998

BETWEEN:

BUTCHER WISE AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE KURUNGAL PEOPLE
Applicant

AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA AND OTHERS
Respondents

JUDGE:

GILMOUR J

DATE:

19 FEBRUARY 2014

PLACE:

PERTH

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. This is an application by the applicant for orders that the respondents, Kimberley Oil NL and Western Metals Zinc NL, be removed as parties to these proceedings.  The application is supported by affidavits of Simon Charles Blackshield, each affirmed on 7 and 31 January 2014 respectively.  I have read the detailed written submissions of the applicant which I accept.  I am satisfied that the orders should be made as sought in the interlocutory application.

I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Gilmour.

Associate:

Dated:       26 March 2014

Details
AGLC
Wise on behalf of the Kurungal People v State of Western Australia [2014] FCA 250
Case
[2014] FCA 250
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, on behalf of the Kurungal people, brought proceedings against the State of Western Australia and others. The applicants sought the removal of two companies, Kimberley Oil NL and Western Metals Zinc NL, from the list of respondents in the native title claim proceedings. The Federal Court of Australia heard the application in the Western Australia District Registry's General Division. The central legal issue was whether the two companies, Kimberley Oil NL and Western Metals Zinc NL, should be removed as parties to the native title claim proceedings. The applicants argued that the companies had no valid interest in the subject matter of the proceedings and should not be parties.

Justice Gilmour accepted the applicants' submissions and found that the companies had no legitimate interest in the proceedings. The Court was satisfied that there were no valid grounds for the companies to remain as parties in the native title claim. The Court determined that removing the companies as parties was appropriate and ordered their removal from the proceedings. Justice Gilmour certified that the reasons for the judgment were correctly transcribed. The Court did not make any orders regarding costs. This decision was a significant step in the native title claim process, clarifying the parties involved and streamlining the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.