FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 1)
Winterbottom & Jardine [2023] FedCFamC1F 912
File number: SYC 6423 of 2023 Judgment of: HENDERSON J Date of judgment: 26 October 2023 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – NULLITY – Consent – Where the applicant asserts he was mentally incapable to consent to the marriage on the basis of mental disorders and learning difficulties – Where the respondent filed a Submitting Notice – Finding the applicant was not mentally incapable – Formalities – Where the applicant asserts certain requirements under the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) were not complied with – Where such non-compliance does not invalidate a marriage – Application for nullity dismissed – No order as to costs. Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 51.
Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) ss 23B, 23B(1), 23B(1)(d)(iii), 42, 42(1)(a), 42(5), 42(5A), 42(10), 46, 48.
Cases cited: AK and NC (2004) FLC 93-178; [2003] FamCA 1006.
Pannos & Fotinos [2020] FamCA 102.
Division: Division 1 First Instance Number of paragraphs: 29 Date of hearing: On the papers Place: Sydney – in Chambers Solicitor for the Applicant: Hammond Nguyen Turnbull The Respondent: Litigant in person (Did not participate) ORDERS
SYC 6423 of 2023 FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)
BETWEEN: MR WINTERBOTTOM
Applicant
AND: MS JARDINE
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
HENDERSON J
DATE OF ORDER:
26 OCTOBER 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The Initiating Application filed 30 August 2023 is dismissed.
2.There be no order as to costs.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonyms Winterbottom & Jardine has been approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
HENDERSON J:
INTRODUCTION
This is an application for a declaration of nullity of a marriage filed by the applicant, Mr Winterbottom, on 30 August 2023. The respondent, Ms Jardine, has submitted to the application and agrees that the Court should make the declaration sought.
Although the parties had executed a Minute of Order for the declaration to be made, a declaration such as this is not a matter of consent by parties and requires the Court to make a finding that the marriage is void within the meaning of section 51 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“Family Law Act”) and only then to make the resulting declaration. To that…
Continue reading Winterbottom & Jardine
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Winterbottom & Jardine [2023] FedCFamC1F 912
- Case
- [2023] FedCFamC1F 912
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the evidence and applicable legal provisions to determine if the marriage met the criteria for nullity. It noted that a declaration of nullity requires the court to find the marriage void under section 51 of the Family Law Act and section 23B of the Marriage Act. The court found Mr Winterbottom's arguments regarding his mental capacity and procedural non-compliance did not meet the statutory criteria for a void marriage. The court concluded that the marriage was valid as certain procedural non-compliances did not invalidate the marriage. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for a declaration of nullity.
The court's decision was based on the statutory grounds for declaring a marriage void, as outlined in the Marriage Act. Mr Winterbottom failed to establish any grounds under these provisions that would justify a declaration of nullity. The court's reasoning and findings led to the dismissal of the application, with no order as to costs.
The court ordered that the initiating application filed by Mr Winterbottom on 30 August 2023 be dismissed. Additionally, there was no order as to costs. The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Orders
Orders of the court
SYC 6423 of 2023
FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)
BETWEEN:
MR WINTERBOTTOM
Applicant
AND:
MS JARDINE
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
HENDERSON J
DATE OF ORDER:
26 OCTOBER 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Initiating Application filed 30 August 2023 is dismissed.
2. There be no order as to costs.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.