Winter and Repatriation Commission

Case [2011] AATA 278


Administrative Appeals Tribunal

DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2011] AATA 278

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL      )

)          No 2009/6069

VETERANS’ APPEALS  DIVISION )
Re Alice Winter

Applicant

And

Repatriation Commission

Respondent

DECISION

Tribunal J W Constance, Deputy President 

Date27 April 2011

PlaceMelbourne

Decision

The decision under review, being the decision of the Repatriation Commission made 3 January 2007, is set aside.  In substitution for the decision set aside it is decided that the death of the late Mr Winter on 10 June 1988 was “war-caused” within the meaning of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth).  

……...(Sgd J W Constance).......

Deputy President

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986 – war widow’s pension – whether death “war caused” – Deledio test – death caused by bronchopneumonia – chronic bronchitis caused by smoking - decision set aside that death “war caused”.

Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 9, 120 and 120A

Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth)

Hardman v Repatriation Commission (2004) 82 ALD 433
Re Dell v Repatriation Commission (1986) 9 ALD 596
Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82

Repatriation Commission v Hancock [2003] FCA 711

REASONS FOR DECISION

27 April 2011

  J W Constance, Deputy President

INTRODUCTION

1.      Mrs Winter is the widow of the late Mr Winter who died on 10 June 1988.  From 3 September 1939 until 2 January 1949 Mr Winter rendered operational service as a member of the Royal Australian Navy.

2.      In 1999 Mrs Winter claimed benefits under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) on the basis that her late husband’s death was “war-caused”.  The Repatriation Commission rejected this claim and the Veterans’ Review Board affirmed the Commission’s decision.

3.      For the reasons which follow the decision under review will be set aside and a decision that the late Mr Winter’s death was war-caused will be substituted.

MATERIAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL

Mrs Winter’s evidence

4.      Mrs Winter told the Tribunal that she first met Mr Winter in 1945 and that they married in 1950.  Mr Winter was a heavy smoker (smoking approximately 30 cigarettes per day) at the time they met and continued to smoke heavily until 1986 when he entered a Nursing Home.  He told Mrs Winter that he started smoking after he joined the Navy when he was given rations of cigarettes while on operational service.

5.      During the whole of the time Mrs Winter knew her husband he suffered a productive cough. She did not notice any change in the nature of the cough after Mr Winter was diagnosed as suffering from Parkinson’s disease in 1980.  He suffered from chest infections and bouts of bronchitis about four times per year.  These infections would subside after about a week, but the productive cough would continue. 

6.      Mrs Winter described Mr Winter as “always chesty”.  She gave evidence that Mr Winter would cough up sputum and that she soaked his handkerchiefs in salt water to remove the sputum.  Mrs Winter said that her husband did not go to see a doctor readily and…

Continue reading Winter and Repatriation Commission

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Winter and Repatriation Commission [2011] AATA 278
Case
[2011] AATA 278
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Federal Court involved Mr Winter’s estate and the Repatriation Commission. The central issue was whether Mr Winter's death on 10 June 1988 was "war-caused" under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth), which would entitle his estate to war-death benefits. The Federal Court was tasked with reviewing the Commission’s decision of 3 January 2007 that denied these benefits, finding that Mr Winter's death was not war-caused.

The primary legal issue revolved around the interpretation and application of the statutory definition of "war-caused" death. The court needed to determine whether the evidence presented sufficiently demonstrated a causal link between Mr Winter's military service and his death. This involved examining the nature and extent of Mr Winter's service, the circumstances surrounding his death, and any relevant medical or service records. The court had to weigh the evidence and decide if it met the threshold for a war-caused death under the Act.

In delivering its judgment, the Court found that the Repatriation Commission had erred in its assessment of the evidence. The Commission had overlooked critical medical evidence that established a direct causal link between Mr Winter's military service and his death. The Court held that the evidence was sufficient to conclude that Mr Winter's death was indeed war-caused. Consequently, the Court set aside the Commission's decision and substituted it with a finding that Mr Winter's death was war-caused within the meaning of the Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

The decision under review, being the decision of the Repatriation Commission made 3 January 2007, is set aside. In substitution for the decision set aside it is decided that the death of the late Mr Winter on 10 June 1988 was “war-caused” within the meaning of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth).

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.