WINNING
v
THE QUEEN
[2022] HCASL 53
B76/2021
The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland (Morrison and Mullins JJA and Boddice J) to dismiss an appeal from the decision of the trial judge (Judge Chowdhury).
There is no reason to doubt the decision of the Court of Appeal. The application otherwise raises no question of principle of general importance and has insufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
S.J. Gageler S.H.P. Steward 16 March 2022
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Winning v The Queen and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2022] HCASL 53
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the Court of Appeal's decision was correct and whether the case raised a question of principle of general importance. Additionally, the court had to determine if the application had sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. The applicant argued that there were grounds for questioning the Court of Appeal's decision and that the case held significant legal importance.
In dismissing the application, the court found no reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision. The court also concluded that the case did not raise a question of principle of general importance and did not have sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave. The court relied on Rule 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth) to direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. This decision was made by S.J. Gageler and S.H.P. Steward on 16 March 2022.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.