WILSON
v
THE QUEEN
[2018] HCASL 301
M95/2018
The applicant requires an extension of time within which to file his application for special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria. There are insufficient prospects that an appeal would succeed to warrant a grant of special leave. It would therefore be futile to grant the extension of time which is sought.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
V.M. Bell
17 October 2018G.A.A. Nettle
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Wilson v The Queen and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2018] HCASL 301
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the court was whether there were sufficient grounds to grant an extension of time to the applicant to file an application for special leave to appeal. The court considered the relevant rules and precedents, as well as the merits of the applicant's case. The court found that there were insufficient prospects that an appeal would succeed to warrant a grant of special leave, and that it would therefore be futile to grant the extension of time which was sought.
The court concluded that the application for an extension of time should be dismissed, and that it would be futile to grant the extension of time sought. The court directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The court considered the relevant rules and precedents, as well as the merits of the applicant's case, before reaching its decision.
No further orders were made by the court. The application for an extension of time was dismissed, and the court found that it would be futile to grant the extension of time sought. The decision of the court was binding on the parties and could not be appealed further.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.