Wilson v Lesteri

Case [2011] WADC 120


WILSON -v- LESTERI [2011] WADC 120
Last Update:  09/08/2011
WILSON -v- LESTERI [2011] WADC 120
Jurisdiction: DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   Citation No: [2011] WADC 120
  Published: 03/08/2011
Case No: APP:23/2011   Heard: 18 JULY 2011
Coram: STAUDE DCJ   Delivered: 18/07/2011
Location: PERTH   Supplementary Decision:
No of Pages: 9   Judgment Part: 1 of 1
Result: Appeal allowed
Leave to defend granted
[Click here for Judgment in Adobe Acrobat Format ]
Parties: SANDRA WILSON
PUSPA LESTERI

Catchwords: Appeal Appeal from order dismissing application to set aside default judgment Breach of rules of natural justice
Legislation: Magistrates Court (Civil Proceedings) Act 2004

Case References: Nil



JURISDICTION : DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

                  IN CIVIL
LOCATION : PERTH CITATION : WILSON -v- LESTERI [2011] WADC 120 CORAM : STAUDE DCJ HEARD : 18 JULY 2011 DELIVERED : 18 JULY 2011 FILE NO/S : APP 23 of 2011 BETWEEN : SANDRA WILSON
                  Appellant

                  AND

                  PUSPA LESTERI
                  Respondent

Catchwords:

Appeal - Appeal from order dismissing application to set aside default judgment - Breach of rules of natural justice

Legislation:

Magistrates Court (Civil Proceedings) Act 2004

Result:

Appeal allowed
Leave to defend granted

(Page 2)

Representation:

Counsel:


    Appellant : In person
    Respondent : In person

Solicitors:

    Appellant : Not applicable
    Respondent : Not applicable


Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Nil


(Page 3)

1 STAUDE DCJ: [This judgment was delivered extemporaneously on 18 July 2011 and has been edited from the transcript.]


Introduction

2 The appellant, Mrs Wilson, is the defendant in a minor case claim brought by the respondent, Ms Lesteri, in the Magistrates Court of Western Australia at Fremantle, case number 1596 of 2010. Ms Lesteri's claim was for the sum of $600 plus costs of $135.05. Ms Lesteri's claim was stated to be as follows:

          Claimant and defendant entered into a lodging agreement on 25 July 2010. Four weeks into the agreement, the defendant terminated the agreement by handing the claimant an eviction notice. Defendant refuses to refund security bond of $600 to claimant. Claimant seeks return to $600 security bond and allowable costs from defendant.
3 Mrs Wilson entered a notice of intention to defend the claim and in due course, the matter was set down for a pre trial conference at the Magistrates Court at Fremantle at 11.15 am on 1 February 2011. The parties were required to attend the pre-trial conference in person.

4 When the matter was called, there was no appearance by Mrs Wilson and the presiding registrar entered a judgment in default of her appearance in the amount of $735.05.

5 On the same day, an application was made by Mrs Wilson to set aside the default judgment. That application was supported by an affidavit which has two pages and in that affidavit, Mrs Wilson stated:

          I was awaiting the pre-trial hearing. I heard my name called, but could not see the caller as she had left the doorway and could not be seen. I then searched all the rooms, but found after further inquiries that the hearing…

Continue reading Wilson v Lesteri

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Wilson v Lesteri [2011] WADC 120
Case
[2011] WADC 120
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Wilson v Lesteri involved the appellant, Wilson, who sought to appeal against an order dismissing his application to set aside a default judgment. The respondent, Lesteri, had obtained a default judgment against Wilson after Wilson failed to respond to the proceedings. Wilson argued that the dismissal of his application to set aside the default judgment breached the rules of natural justice.

The legal issue before the court was whether the dismissal of the application to set aside the default judgment was a breach of natural justice. Wilson contended that the court failed to consider his application to set aside the default judgment and to provide reasons for its dismissal. Lesteri argued that the application was properly dismissed as it was an abuse of process.

The court found that the dismissal of Wilson's application to set aside the default judgment did breach the rules of natural justice. The court held that the dismissal was not supported by reasons and that Wilson was not given an opportunity to be heard. The court found that the failure to provide reasons and to hear Wilson's application amounted to a breach of natural justice. The appeal was allowed, and leave to defend was granted.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal allowed

Leave to defend granted

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.