JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
IN CHAMBERS
CITATION: WILSON -v- INDIGENOUS SERVICES PTY LTD [2021] WASC 56
CORAM: ALLANSON J
HEARD: 2 MARCH 2021
DELIVERED : 3 MARCH 2021
FILE NO/S: CIV 1043 of 2021
BETWEEN: TERRENCE KIM WILSON
First Plaintiff
URSULA WILSON
Second Plaintiff
MAVIS WESTERMAN
Third Plaintiff
LESLEY RHONDA THORNHILL
Fourth Plaintiff
KAREN BEASLEY
Fifth Plaintiff
AND
INDIGENOUS SERVICES PTY LTD
First Defendant
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Second Defendant
NJAMAL COMMUNITY CORPORATION PTY LTD
Third Defendant
Catchwords:
Trusts - Charitable trust - Where plaintiffs challenge the validity of the appointment of the Trustee - Where plaintiffs seek an interim payment out of the Trust Fund for their legal costs - Whether such an order within the power of the court
Legislation:
Nil
Result:
Application dismissed
Category: B
Representation:
Counsel:
| First Plaintiff | : | Mr C Stokes |
| Second Plaintiff | : | Mr C Stokes |
| Third Plaintiff | : | Mr C Stokes |
| Fourth Plaintiff | : | Mr C Stokes |
| Fifth Plaintiff | : | Mr C Stokes |
| First Defendant | : | Mr L Christensen |
| Second Defendant | : | Ms M J Elliott |
| Third Defendant | : | No appearance |
Solicitors:
| First Plaintiff | : | Chris Stokes & Associates |
| Second Plaintiff | : | Chris Stokes & Associates |
| Third Plaintiff | : | Chris Stokes & Associates |
| Fourth Plaintiff | : | Chris Stokes & Associates |
| Fifth Plaintiff | : | Chris Stokes & Associates |
| First Defendant | : | CX Law |
| Second Defendant | : | State Solicitor for Western Australia |
| Third Defendant | : | No appearance |
Case(s) referred to in decision(s):
Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow [2019] HCA 29; (2019) 93 ALJR 1007
Re Buckton; Buckton v Buckton [1907] 2 Ch 406
Wareham v Marsella [No 2] [2020] VSCA 118
ALLANSON J:
Introduction
The plaintiffs commenced these proceedings by originating summons filed 25 January 2021. The plaintiffs seek relief, including declarations that the first defendant, Indigenous Services Pty Ltd, has been removed as the trustee of the Njamal Peoples Trust, and Njamal Community Corporation Pty Ltd has been validly appointed and remains the validly appointed trustee of the Trust.
The Attorney General of Western Australia is named as the second defendant to the application, and is a proper party because the Trust is a charitable trust.
The plaintiffs seek an order that they be indemnified out of the Trust Fund in respect of their costs of the proceedings. In a minute of proposed orders, filed 18 February 2021, the plaintiffs sought, as interim relief, that the Trustee pay to them the sum of $80,000 from the Trust Fund in respect of their legal costs of this application.
After a short hearing on 2 March 2021, I dismissed the application for interim relief, with reasons to be published. These reasons are concerned solely with the interim application.
The evidence
The plaintiffs relied on the affidavit of Terrence Kim Wilson, filed in support of the originating summons and sworn 18 January 2021; and affidavits of Mr Wilson and Sharon Westerman, both sworn 24 February 2021, in support of the interim application.
The first defendant filed an affidavit of Kathryn…
Continue reading Wilson v Indigenous Services Pty Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Wilson v Indigenous Services Pty Ltd [2021] WASC 56
- Case
- [2021] WASC 56
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court first considered whether it could rely on its general costs powers under s 37 of the Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA) to make the order sought by the plaintiffs. It found that the order was not an order for costs, and therefore the court could not rely on its costs powers. The court next considered whether it could rely on s 21 of the Charitable Trusts Act 1962 (WA) to make the order. It found that it did not have such a power. Finally, the court considered whether it could rely on s 94 of the Trustees Act 1962 (WA) to make the order, but found that the plaintiffs had no standing to apply under that section. The court was not aware of any other relevant source of power that would allow it to make the order sought by the plaintiffs. The application was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.