AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRIT3RY
DISTRICT REZISTRY
| JUDGE MAKi!U ORDER | : | Neaves J . |
| DATE OF ORDER | : | 30 August 1985 |
| WHEFE MADE | : Canberra |
| THE | COURT | ORDERS | THAT: |
| 1. | The time | withln | whlch | to | lnstltute | praceedlngs |
| in this Court | by way of appeal from the decision |
of the Admlnistrative Appeals Tribunal given on 3 December 1934 be extendee up to and including
4 July 1985.
| 2 . | The applicant not later than | 10 September 1985 |
| flle | and serve on the respondent | a | document |
settmg aut m t h preclsion the questions of la51
to be raised on tLe appeai.
2 .
3 .
4 .
c
a.
| Note: | Set t lement | and | e n t r y of | 2 r d e r s | is | ~ e a l c w l t h lr! |
Order 36 cof the Federa l Co1,rt Ftules.
l
| AND : | THE SECRETARY. | DjEPS'nTPEiL'T | OF |
| SOC1P.L | SECUETT'J |
iiespondent
This i's an applicatlon by Hug9 Rupbert Wilson ("the
| applicant") for an | extension of tlme wlthln whlch to mstltute |
| proceedings In thls Court by | wzy of appeal from the declsion | of |
the Admmistratlve Appeals Trlbunal given on 3 December 1S84 afflrming a declslon of the Secretary to the Department of Soclal Security ("the respondent") to cancel the payment of invalid pension to the applicant. A notice of appeal was in fact filed m the Court on 4 July 1985 so that %hat is sought
| is an extension of tlme up to and includlng | that date. |
2 .
| G r e a t e r d i f f l c u l t g , h o w e v e r , | arises | I n | r e l a t l o n t o | t h e |
| perlo+. | from | 10 Aprll | 1985 to | 4 J u l y l 9 @ 5 . | On | t h e | m a t e r i a l |
| S s f o r e | me, | I | can | o | conc lude | ly | t ha t | t he | tact | t h a t | the |
| p r o c e e d m g s | w | e | r | e | n o t | i n R t i t u t e d | e a r l i e r | than 4 J u l y | 1985 waz |
| a t t r i b u t a b l e | s o l e l y t o | delay | on | t h e | p a r t | of | the | a p p l i c a n t ' s |
| l e g a l | a d v i s e r s | I n | s e t t l i n g | t h e | n o t l c e | of | appes i | and | a r ranqlnq |
| for | It | t o b e f i l e d . | No | d e t a i l s h a v e b e e n u i v e n | t o | e x p l a l n | t h i s |
| de l ay | a l though | i t | must | be | said tha t , so | far as | a p p e a r s , no |
| There are, | however, f m 3 . c t G j r s whlch may | be reqsrded a5 |
suiflclent to relieve r;he applicant of the con:eqkence: of tilat delay. They lnclde the clrcumnzance that as early as December
| 1384 | the respcndent | G , T ~ S lnformed of | the | possibility gf | an |
appeal and the fuctker clrcumstance tha; that notiilcafiun wa5 suppicmenced by a 1er;ter i?ated 22 Q r l l 1985 lnformlng the respondent tha: an 3ppeal was to be l o i q e t . The respondent was
| thus always aware that active conslderation was being | #:riven to |
t'ne lnstitutlon of an appeal. I have a150 taken into accmnt that on at least two occasions the appllcant's solicitor was
| informed that the respondent would not oppose | an appllcatlon |
| f o r leave to | file a notice of appeal out | of tlme, an attitude |
| which | the respondent maintained when the present appllcatlon |
| came on for hearhq. | Another matter to | be taken Into account |
| is that the present application may properly | be determined upon |
| consideratlons vhich | affect only the immediate partles: see |
| Wedesweiller v . | (1983) 47 A.L.R. 528 at p.531. |
| not accurately | or adequately ldentlfy the question- of law to |
| be ralsed on the appeal. | idhat appear- to | be necessary 1 s for |
| the | applicant's | legal | advisers | to | analyse | carefully | the |
fmdlngs made by the Trlbunal, to Identify the particular
respects m cdnch the Tribunal is alleged to have erred m law
and then to artlculste clearly and cnnclsely t h e questions of
| law that the appllcant intend: | to arque on | Kqe hearing of the |
appeal. I, therefore, dlrect that not later than 10 September
1985 the appllcant file and serve on the respondent a document
| settmg out with preclsion the | questions of law to be raised on |
. .
| the | appea l . | That | daczument | should . of ccurse, | be lncludec! | In |
| t h e appesl p p e r s t o be | pr?pared pursua!?t t o Order 53, i k l e 16 |
of the Federal Codr t Rules.
| I | c e r t l f y | that t h l s | a n d |
| the preceding 4 | pages a re |
| a | t rue copy | of | the Reasons |
| f o r Judgment h e r e i n of | the |
| Honocrable | Mr | J u s t l c e |
Assoc ia t e
| Dated: | 30 August 1985 |
- AGLC
- Wilson, H.R. v The Secretary, Department of Social Security [1985] FCA 428
- Case
- [1985] FCA 428
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the notice of appeal was primarily due to the actions of the applicant's legal advisers, who had failed to set the notice of appeal and arrange for its filing promptly. However, the court considered several mitigating factors, including that the respondent had been informed of the possibility of an appeal as early as December 1984 and that the respondent had indicated they would not oppose an application for leave to file a notice of appeal out of time. The court also noted that the applicant's solicitor had been informed on at least two occasions that the respondent would not oppose the application. Given these factors, the court was satisfied that the applicant's delay was not entirely unjustified. Consequently, the court granted the applicant an extension of time to file the notice of appeal, up to and including 4 July 1985. The court further directed that the applicant must file and serve on the respondent a document setting out with precision the questions of law to be raised on appeal, not later than 10 September 1985. This document should be included in the appeal papers prepared pursuant to Order 53, Rule 16 of the Federal Court Rules.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.