Wilson, H.R. v The Secretary, Department of Social Security
[1985] FCA 428
•30 Aug 1985
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRIT3RY
DISTRICT REZISTRY
| JUDGE MAKi!U ORDER | : | Neaves J . |
| DATE OF ORDER | : | 30 August 1985 |
| WHEFE MADE | : Canberra |
| THE | COURT | ORDERS | THAT: |
| 1. | The time | withln | whlch | to | lnstltute | praceedlngs |
| in this Court | by way of appeal from the decision |
of the Admlnistrative Appeals Tribunal given on 3 December 1934 be extendee up to and including
4 July 1985.
| 2 . | The applicant not later than | 10 September 1985 |
| flle | and serve on the respondent | a | document |
settmg aut m t h preclsion the questions of la51
to be raised on tLe appeai.
2 .
3 .
4 .
c
a.
| Note: | Set t lement | and | e n t r y of | 2 r d e r s | is | ~ e a l c w l t h lr! |
Order 36 cof the Federa l Co1,rt Ftules.
l
| AND : | THE SECRETARY. | DjEPS'nTPEiL'T | OF |
| SOC1P.L | SECUETT'J |
iiespondent
This i's an applicatlon by Hug9 Rupbert Wilson ("the
| applicant") for an | extension of tlme wlthln whlch to mstltute |
| proceedings In thls Court by | wzy of appeal from the declsion | of |
the Admmistratlve Appeals Trlbunal given on 3 December 1S84 afflrming a declslon of the Secretary to the Department of Soclal Security ("the respondent") to cancel the payment of invalid pension to the applicant. A notice of appeal was in fact filed m the Court on 4 July 1985 so that %hat is sought
| is an extension of tlme up to and includlng | that date. |
2 .
| G r e a t e r d i f f l c u l t g , h o w e v e r , | arises | I n | r e l a t l o n t o | t h e |
| perlo+. | from | 10 Aprll | 1985 to | 4 J u l y l 9 @ 5 . | On | t h e | m a t e r i a l |
| S s f o r e | me, | I | can | o | conc lude | ly | t ha t | t he | tact | t h a t | the |
| p r o c e e d m g s | w | e | r | e | n o t | i n R t i t u t e d | e a r l i e r | than 4 J u l y | 1985 waz |
| a t t r i b u t a b l e | s o l e l y t o | delay | on | t h e | p a r t | of | the | a p p l i c a n t ' s |
| l e g a l | a d v i s e r s | I n | s e t t l i n g | t h e | n o t l c e | of | appes i | and | a r ranqlnq |
| for | It | t o b e f i l e d . | No | d e t a i l s h a v e b e e n u i v e n | t o | e x p l a l n | t h i s |
| de l ay | a l though | i t | must | be | said tha t , so | far as | a p p e a r s , no |
| There are, | however, f m 3 . c t G j r s whlch may | be reqsrded a5 |
suiflclent to relieve r;he applicant of the con:eqkence: of tilat delay. They lnclde the clrcumnzance that as early as December
| 1384 | the respcndent | G , T ~ S lnformed of | the | possibility gf | an |
appeal and the fuctker clrcumstance tha; that notiilcafiun wa5 suppicmenced by a 1er;ter i?ated 22 Q r l l 1985 lnformlng the respondent tha: an 3ppeal was to be l o i q e t . The respondent was
| thus always aware that active conslderation was being | #:riven to |
t'ne lnstitutlon of an appeal. I have a150 taken into accmnt that on at least two occasions the appllcant's solicitor was
| informed that the respondent would not oppose | an appllcatlon |
| f o r leave to | file a notice of appeal out | of tlme, an attitude |
| which | the respondent maintained when the present appllcatlon |
| came on for hearhq. | Another matter to | be taken Into account |
| is that the present application may properly | be determined upon |
| consideratlons vhich | affect only the immediate partles: see |
| Wedesweiller v . | (1983) 47 A.L.R. 528 at p.531. |
| not accurately | or adequately ldentlfy the question- of law to |
| be ralsed on the appeal. | idhat appear- to | be necessary 1 s for |
| the | applicant's | legal | advisers | to | analyse | carefully | the |
fmdlngs made by the Trlbunal, to Identify the particular
respects m cdnch the Tribunal is alleged to have erred m law
and then to artlculste clearly and cnnclsely t h e questions of
| law that the appllcant intend: | to arque on | Kqe hearing of the |
appeal. I, therefore, dlrect that not later than 10 September
1985 the appllcant file and serve on the respondent a document
| settmg out with preclsion the | questions of law to be raised on |
. .
| the | appea l . | That | daczument | should . of ccurse, | be lncludec! | In |
| t h e appesl p p e r s t o be | pr?pared pursua!?t t o Order 53, i k l e 16 |
of the Federal Codr t Rules.
| I | c e r t l f y | that t h l s | a n d |
| the preceding 4 | pages a re |
| a | t rue copy | of | the Reasons |
| f o r Judgment h e r e i n of | the |
| Honocrable | Mr | J u s t l c e |
Assoc ia t e
| Dated: | 30 August 1985 |
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Limitation Periods
-
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
12
0
0