FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| WILLIAMS v THE PEOPLE'S SOLICITORS PTY LTD | [2011] FMCA 482 |
| BANKRUPTCY – Application to set aside or extend time of a bankruptcy notice – debt based upon costs assessment in the Local Court – effect of application to pay by instalments – whether cross-claim exceeding judgment debt – application for review of the costs assessment – stay on execution under s.377 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) – bankruptcy notice valid – no grounds for setting aside – time for compliance extended until completion of costs review. |
| Bankruptcy Act 1966, ss.40(1)(g), 41(3), 41(6A), 41(7) Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s.377 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr.37.2, 37.3, 37.5 |
| Applicant: | BARRY THOMAS WILLIAMS |
| Respondent: | THE PEOPLE'S SOLICITORS PTY LTD |
| File Number: | SYG 650 of 2011 |
| Judgment of: | Smith FM |
| Hearing date: | 15 June 2011 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 15 June 2011 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | In Person |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr K Liu & Mr B Ramsey |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | The People's Solicitors |
ORDERS
Pursuant to s.41(6A)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) the time for compliance with Bankruptcy Notice BN1608 issued 9 March 2011 is extended until the date on which a certificate is issued under s.378(1) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) in relation to the costs assessment review in case number 2010/000143080.
The application is otherwise dismissed.
The applicant must pay the respondent’s costs, including reserved costs, as agreed or taxed under the Federal Magistrates Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2006 (Cth).
The applicant must provide a copy of this order to the Official Receiver within 2 working days.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 650 of 2011
| BARRY THOMAS WILLIAMS |
Applicant
And
| THE PEOPLE'S SOLICITORS PTY LTD |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(revised from transcript)
This judgment explains why I am persuaded to extend time for Mr Williams to comply with a bankruptcy notice, but am not satisfied that I should set aside the notice.
Mr Williams employed solicitors practicing as “The People’s Solicitors” to defend proceedings in the Supreme Court, the nature of which is obscure. The proceedings ended with Mr Williams’ withdrawing his defence. He was served by The People’s Solicitors with further invoices for their legal services, which he refused to pay. The People’s Solicitors commenced proceedings to recover their outstanding fees in…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Williams v The People's Solicitors Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2011] FMCA 482
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the court was required to decide was whether the time for compliance with the Bankruptcy Notice could be extended until the conclusion of a costs assessment review. This question required the court to consider the interplay between the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) and the Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), as well as the specific provisions of each Act relevant to the respective proceedings.
The court found that the Bankruptcy Notice was issued on 9 March 2011, and the applicant sought an extension of time for compliance with this notice until the costs assessment review was concluded. The court considered that the extension was permissible under section 41(6A)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act, as it would not unduly prejudice the respondent. The court also took into account the necessity of resolving the costs assessment review before proceeding with the bankruptcy compliance. Consequently, the court granted the extension of time for compliance until the issuance of the certificate under section 378(1) of the Legal Profession Act.
The court further ordered that the application was dismissed in all other respects and that the applicant must pay the respondent's costs, including reserved costs, as agreed or taxed under the relevant legislation. This decision underscores the importance of coordinating proceedings across different legislative frameworks to ensure fair and just outcomes.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Pursuant to s.41(6A)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) the time for compliance with Bankruptcy Notice BN1608 issued 9 March 2011 is extended until the date on which a certificate is issued under s.378(1) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) in relation to the costs assessment review in case number 2010/000143080.
2.
The application is otherwise dismissed.
3.
The applicant must pay the respondent’s costs, including reserved costs, as agreed or taxed under the
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.