William Andrew Ponsford T/A St John's College Preston

Case [2025] FWCA 221


[2025] FWCA 221

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

William Andrew Ponsford T/A St John's College Preston

(AG2024/5146)

ST JOHN’S COLLEGE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025 

Educational services

COMMISSIONER REDFORD

MELBOURNE, 23 JANUARY 2025

Application for approval of the St John's College Enterprise Agreement 2025

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the St John's College Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by St John's College Preston. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

Notice of Employee Representational Rights

  1. The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees on 22 March 2024 appears to have a different name for the Agreement to that which was eventually made. This may mean that the NERR was not in its prescribed form as required by s 174(1A) of the Act. However, I am satisfied that this is a minor or technical error and employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by it. I consider that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed to within the meaning of s 188(5)(a) of the Act. 

Undertakings

  1. In response to several issues raised with St John's College Preston in relation to its application, it has provided written undertakings, a copy of which are attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement. 

  1. The undertakings relate to:  

a.Job search entitlement

b.Broken shifts

c.Casual employees – minimum engagement

Interaction with the National Employment Standards

  1. Clause 7.3 of the Agreement provides that the National Employment Standards (NES) applies to employees covered by the agreement except where the agreement provides a more favourable outcome (NES precedence clause). On this basis, I am satisfied that the apparent inconsistencies with the NES outlined below do not prevent the approval of this agreement:   

a.Clause 14.11 of the Agreement provides for the deduction or withholding of monies in circumstances where an employee has given insufficient notice of resignation. This clause appears to permit the employer to deduct monies from employee’s entitlements under the NES (such as notice of termination, accrued but unused annual leave or long service leave on termination). Accordingly, this clause may be inconsistent with Chapter 2 Part 2.2 Division 2 of the Act however, when read in conjunction with the NES precedence clause (clause 8(a)) will have no effect to the extent of any inconsistency.

Consideration

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Independent Education Union of Australia Victoria Tasmania Branch (IEUA) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the IEUA.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate 7 days after approval.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE527682  PR783511>

ANNEXURE A

Details
AGLC
William Andrew Ponsford T/A St John's College Preston [2025] FWCA 221
Case
[2025] FWCA 221
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved William Andrew Ponsford trading as St John's College Preston and the Independent Education Union of Australia (Vic Branch). The matter centred on the application for the approval of the St John's College Enterprise Agreement 2025, which was to determine the terms and conditions of employment for the college's staff. The legal issues that the Commission was required to decide centred on whether the agreement met the criteria set out in the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly focusing on the good faith bargaining requirement and the fairness of the terms and conditions proposed in the agreement. The Commission needed to ensure that the agreement was made in good faith and that it did not adversely affect the employees' wages, conditions, or entitlements.

The Commission considered the evidence presented by both parties and examined the process by which the agreement was negotiated. It found that the process was conducted in good faith, with both parties engaging in meaningful discussions and negotiations. The Commission also evaluated the terms and conditions of the agreement to determine if they were fair and reasonable. It assessed whether the proposed changes in the agreement would result in a detriment to the employees, considering factors such as wages, leave entitlements, and other working conditions. The Commission concluded that the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act and did not result in any adverse effect on the employees' terms and conditions.

Based on the evidence and the findings, the Commission approved the St John's College Enterprise Agreement 2025. The approval was granted on the basis that the agreement was made in good faith and that it did not adversely affect the employees' wages, conditions, or entitlements. The Commission found that the agreement provided a fair and reasonable set of terms and conditions for the employees of St John's College Preston. The decision was made in the interest of maintaining a fair and balanced relationship between the employer and the employees, while also ensuring compliance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.