Wilkinson, Louise Elizabeth v Katies Fashions (Aust.) Pty ltd
[1986] FCA 676
•31 Oct 1986
| IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA | ) |
| VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY | 1 No. VG57 of 1985 |
| GENERAL DIVISION | ) |
| BETWEEN: LOUISE | EL | I ZABETH |
WILKINSON
Frosecutor
| A m : KATIES FASHIONS I'AUST. | ) |
FTY. LTD.
Defendant
| BETWEEN : | LOUISE | ELIZABETH |
WILKINSON
Prosecutor
m: ARPEL AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD.
Defendant
| CORAM : | Jenkinson J. |
| PLACE : | Melbourne |
| DATE : | 31 October, 1986 |
| The | circumstances in which t.he defendants | committed |
contraventions crf s.53(a) of the Trade Practicss Act 1374 have
been stated in reasons for judgment published an 28 J u l y 1986.
| It will | be apparent from a perusal of those reasons that |
| nu curlcsrn | far financial advantage tu either defendant | ur | its |
| holdiny company had contributed to | bring about the contraventions. |
And, although the defendants and their associated companies were
for some time mistaken a5 to the nature of the contraventions and
the causes thereof, they were prepared promptly to take thorough
| and | not | inexpensive | measures | to ensure | that | no further |
contravention occurred.
| There had been no warning indications that mistakes | of |
| the kind which resulted | in the contraventions might be occurring. |
The gravamen of the ca5e against the defendants is simply this :
that they failed tcs acknuwledye tu themselves the risk of human error, inherent in the process of reprssentation Ly labelling, as
of sufficient gravity to warrant their subjecting the process to
an inexpensive sumeillance for the purpose of detecting such error . !?arts V and VI of the Trade Fractices Act 1974 disclose a policy to deter by criminal sanction even such a relatively minor
| - | culpability in those | who in trade | or commerce make commercially |
| significant misrepresentations to consumers in connexion | with the |
| supply of goods. |
| The defendant Katies Fashions (Aust.) | Pty. Ltd. in the |
| proceeding VG57 of 1985 is convicted and Fined | $300 and ordered to |
| pay the prosecutor’s costs (including costs | reserved) of the |
| proceedinq. |
3 .
The defendant Arpel Australia Pty. Ltd. is in each of
| the proceedings VG60, | VG62 and VG63 | of 1385 convicted and fined |
| $300 and ordered | to pay -the prosecutor's c o s t s (including costs |
reserved) of that proceeding.
: :
0
0
0