Wilkinson, Louise Elizabeth v Katies Fashions (Aust.) Pty ltd

Case

[1986] FCA 676

31 Oct 1986

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

)

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

1 No. VG57 of 1985

GENERAL DIVISION

)

BETWEEN: LOUISE

EL

I ZABETH

WILKINSON

Frosecutor

A m : KATIES FASHIONS I'AUST.

)

FTY. LTD.

Defendant

BETWEEN :

LOUISE

ELIZABETH

WILKINSON

Prosecutor

m: ARPEL AUSTRALIA PTY. LTD.

Defendant

CORAM :

Jenkinson J.

PLACE :

Melbourne

DATE :

31 October, 1986

The

circumstances in which t.he defendants

committed

contraventions crf s.53(a) of the Trade Practicss Act 1374 have

been stated in reasons for judgment published an 28 J u l y 1986.

It will

be apparent from a perusal of those reasons that

nu curlcsrn

far financial advantage tu either defendant

ur

its

holdiny company had contributed to

bring about the contraventions.

And, although the defendants and their associated companies were

for some time mistaken a5 to the nature of the contraventions and

the causes thereof, they were prepared promptly to take thorough

and

not

inexpensive

measures

to ensure

that

no further

contravention occurred.

There had been no warning indications that mistakes

of

the kind which resulted

in the contraventions might be occurring.

The gravamen of the ca5e against the defendants is simply this :

that they failed tcs acknuwledye tu themselves the risk of human error, inherent in the process of reprssentation Ly labelling, as

of sufficient gravity to warrant their subjecting the process to

an inexpensive sumeillance for the purpose of detecting such error . !?arts V and VI of the Trade Fractices Act 1974 disclose a policy to deter by criminal sanction even such a relatively minor

-

culpability in those

who in trade

or commerce make commercially

significant misrepresentations to consumers in connexion

with the

supply of goods.

The defendant Katies Fashions (Aust.)

Pty. Ltd. in the

proceeding VG57 of 1985 is convicted and Fined

$300 and ordered to

pay the prosecutor’s costs (including costs

reserved) of the

proceedinq.

3 .

The defendant Arpel Australia Pty. Ltd. is in each of

the proceedings VG60,

VG62 and VG63

of 1385 convicted and fined

$300 and ordered

to pay -the prosecutor's c o s t s (including costs

reserved) of that proceeding.

: :

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0