Wilderness School Limited

Case [2025] FWCA 2244


[2025] FWCA 2244

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Wilderness School Limited

(AG2025/1213)

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE WILDERNESS SCHOOL LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Educational services

COMMISSIONER THORNTON

ADELAIDE, 8 JULY 2025

Application for approval of the Wilderness School Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Wilderness School Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Wilderness School Limited (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The Agreement does not contain a flexibility term that meets the requirements of the Act. Employees were asked to vote to approve the agreement on 10 April 2025. Thus, pursuant to s.202(4) and Clause 107 of Schedule 1 of the Act, the model flexibility term as prescribed by the Fair Work (Model Terms) Determination 2025 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. The Applicant has made submissions that a number of employees on annualised salaries do not regularly work outside of hours, such that those employees are not worse off than if they were covered by the relevant Award. The Applicant submits that the salaries paid to those employees are in excess of entitlements that would otherwise be payable to the employees under the Agreement. Pursuant to sections 193A(6) and (6A) of the Act, I have had regard to the submissions of the Applicant that regular out of hours work for employees paid an annualised salary is not reasonably foreseeable. I accept the submissions of the Applicant. For completeness I note the terms of section 227A of the Act that allows the Commission, in certain circumstances, to reconsider whether the Agreement passes the better off overall test if there are changes to the patterns of work at a later time.

  1. The Independent Education Union of Australia (IEUA) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the IEUA.

  1. The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act from 15 July 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2027.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE529618  PR789029>

ANNEXURE A

Details
AGLC
Wilderness School Limited [2025] FWCA 2244
Case
[2025] FWCA 2244
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Wilderness School Limited was the subject of an application for the approval of the Wilderness School Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2025. The application was made to the Fair Work Commission, which had to determine whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute centred on whether the agreement adequately provided for the employees' rights and entitlements, including minimum wage rates, penalty rates, and other employment conditions.

The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement was made in good faith, whether it provided for the fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and whether it met the criteria for being a simple, low-risk, or high-risk agreement. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement provided for the minimum terms and conditions, and whether it complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act.

The Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and provided for the fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The agreement met the criteria for a low-risk agreement, as it covered a small number of employees and did not significantly alter the terms and conditions of employment. The Commission also found that the agreement provided for the minimum terms and conditions and complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications to ensure compliance with the Act.

The Commission made several orders approving the agreement, subject to the modifications. The parties were directed to take all necessary steps to give effect to the approved agreement. The Commission also ordered that the agreement be registered with the Fair Work Ombudsman.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.