Wild Dog Destruction (Amendment) Act 1950 (NSW)

Case
No judgment structure available for this case.

WILD DOG DESTRUCTION (AMENDMENT) ACT.

Act No. 35, 1950.

George VI, An Act to amend the Wild Dog Destruction Act,

1921, m certain respects; and tor purposes connected therewith. [Assented to, 14th November, 1950.]

"DE it enacted by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty,

by and with the advice and consent of the Legis­

lative Council and Legislative Assembly of New South

Wales in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of

the same, as follows:—

Short title

and citation.

1. (1) This Act may be cited as the “ Wild Dog

Destruction (Amendment) Act, 1950.”

(2) The Wild Dog Destruction Act, 1921, as amended by subsequent Acts and by this Act, may be cited as the Wild Dog Destruction Act, 1921-1950.

Wild Dog Destruction (Amendment) Act.

427

2. The Wild Dog Destruction Act, 1921, as amended No. 35, 1950.

by subsequent Acts, is amended

Aet No. 17,

1921.

(a)

by inserting next after section nine the following Xe.vsec. 9a.

new section:—

9 a . The Commissioner may if in his opinion Ersctionof

maintaining an efficient barrier against wild dogs cotumis-

enter or authorise any person to enter upon any

land in the vicinity of the fence known as the

“ Queensland Border Fence” from Hungerford

to the South Australian border and of the fence

known as the “ South Australian Border Fence”

erected on or near the w’estern border of New

it is necessary so to do for the purpose of fence or convert any existing fence into a dog-proof fence and maintain or repair such fence.

(b)

by omitting from subsection one of section twelve Sec. 12.

the words “ one twentj'-tifth” and by inserting in (Kate to be

imposed.)

lieu thereof the words

‘one-eighth” ;

(c) (i) by omitting from section three the definition See. 3.

of “ Commissioners” and by inserting in (Defini-

lieu thereof the words “ ‘Commissioner’

means the Western Lands Commissioner

appointed under the Western Lands Act of

1901, as amended by subsequent Acts” ;

(ii)   by omitting from the same section where firstly and lastly occurring the word “ Commissioners” and by inserting in lieu thereof the word “ Commissioner” ;

(d)

by omitting from section five the words “The Scc.5. Commissioners, or any of them” and by inserting ( Power of in lieu thereof the words “ The Commissioner” ; ianZ)”̂ °°

(e)

the Commissioners have reason to believe that A'oticetoowner or

there are wild dogs upon any land they may’ ̂ occupier.),

by omitting from section six the words “Where ‘’oc. 6. “ Where the Commissioner has reason to believe that there are wild dogs upon any land he may” ;

( f ) .

428                  Wild Dog Destruction (Amendment) Act.

No. 35, 1950.

(f) (i) by omitting from subsection one of section

Sec.8.

eight the words “ the Commissioners are”

(Paymeut

and by inserting in lieu thereof the words-

to fund.)

“ the Commissioner is ” ;

(ii)   by omitting from the same subsection the word “ they” where firstly, secondly and thirdly occurring and by inserting in lieu thereof the words “ the Commissioner” ;

(iii)   by omitting from the same subsection the words “ they have” and by inserting in lieu thereof the words “ the Commissioner has” ;.

(iv) by omitting from subsection two of the same section the word “ Commissioners”' wherever occurring and by inserting in lieu thereof the word “ Commissioner” ;

-

Sec. 9.

(g) by omitting from section nine the words “ the-

authorised

(Powers of

Commissioners are” and by inserting in lieu

person.)

thereof the words “ the Commissioner is ” ;

Sec. 10.

(h) by omitting from section ten the word “ Com­

(Authorised

person not

missioners” and by inserting in lieu thereof

to be

the word “ Commissioner” ;

deemed a

trespasser.)

Sec. 11.

(i) by omitting from section eleven the words

(Recovery oi

“ Commissioners” wherever occurring, “ them”

expenses

incurred by

and “ their” and by inserting in lieu thereof the

Commis­

words “ Commissioner,” “ him” and “ his”

sioners.)

respectively;

Sec. 12.

(j) (i) by omitting from subsection one of section

(Rate to be

twelve the word “ Commissioners” and by

imposed.)

inserting in lieu thereof the word “ Com­

missioner” ;

.

(ii)

by omitting from sulisection two of the same section the words “ Commissioners certify” and by inserting in lieu thereof tlie words “ Commissioner certif.es” ;

See. 14.

(k) by omitting from section fourteen the words “ Commissioners so direct” and by inserting in lien thereof tlie words “ (ummissioner so­

(N oticeof

.

d iiects” ;

( 1)

Wild Dog Destruction (Amendment) Act.

429

No. 35, 1950.

(1) by omitting from section fifteen the word

__

“ Commissioners” wherever occurring and by sec . i5 .

inserting in lieu thereof the word “ Commis

enclosed by

(Land

sioner” ;

dog-proof

fence.)

(m) by omitting from section sixteen the word

Sec. 16.

(Effect of

i

“ Commissioners” and by inserting in lieu

charge

thereof the word “ Commissioner” ;

upon land.)

(n) by omitting from section nineteen the word

Sec. 19.

(Vv’ild Dog

“ Commissioners” and by inserting in lieu

Destruction

thereof the word “ Commissioner” ;

Fund.)

(o)

by omitting from section twenty-one the word See. 21.

“ Commissioners” wherever occurring and by

inserting in lieu thereof the word “ Commis-

sioner” ;

(p) by omitting from section twenty-four the word Sec. 24.

(Commis­

“ Commissioners” and by inserting in lieu

sioners may

thereof the word “ Commissioner” ;

employ

persons.)

(q) by omitting from section twenty-six the word

Sec. 26.

(Possession

“ Commissioners” and by inserting in lieu

of dingo.)

thereof the word “ Commissioner” ;

(r) (i) by omitting from subsection two of section See. 29.

twenty-nine the words “ Commissioners, or

any of them” and by inserting in lieu obstruction

thereof the word “ Commissioner” ; ,

'

authonsed

(ii)   by omitting from the same subsection the F'-rson.) words “ them or.”

CRIMES

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0