| [2025] FWCA 2069 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Wickro Pty Ltd ATF The Belmont Property Unit Trust T/A Homestyle Aged Care Services
(AG2025/1889)
HOMESTYLE AGED CARE SERVICES, ANMF AND HWU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024-2028
| Aged care industry | |
| COMMISSIONER REDFORD | MELBOURNE, 27 JUNE 2025 |
Application for approval of the Homestyle Aged Care Services, ANMF and HWU Enterprise Agreement 2024-2028
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Homestyle Aged Care Service, ANMF and HWU Enterprise Agreement 2024-2028 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Wickro Pty Ltd ATF The Belmont Property Unit Trust T/A Homestyle Aged Care Services (Homestyle Aged Care Services). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
Undertakings
In response to several issues raised with Homestyle Aged Care Services in relation to its application, it has provided written undertakings, a copy of which are attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
The undertakings relate to:
a.Employment of persons in introductory and Level 1 and 2 classifications.
b.The incorporation by reference of the relevant Awards into the Agreement.
c.A correction to clause 40(b) of the Agreement, such that the reference to
“48 hours” should read “38 hours”.
Interaction with the National Employment Standards
The Agreement provides that where it also has provisions regarding matters dealt with under the National Employment Standards (NES) and the provisions in the NES are more favourable to an employee in a particular respect than those provisions, then the NES will prevail in that respect and the provisions dealing with that matter in the Agreement will have no effect (NES precedence clause). On this basis, I am satisfied that the apparent inconsistencies with the NES outlined below do not prevent the approval of this agreement.
a.Clause 49(e) of the Agreement provides that an employee must, where practicable, give the Employer notice prior to the absence of the intention to take leave. It is an expectation of the Employer that the Employee gives notice of their absence of at least 4 hours before the time they are rostered to commence duty on the day of the absence. If it is not practicable for the Employee to give prior notice of absence of at least 4 hours, the Employee must notify the Employer by telephone of such absence To the extent this requires a more onerous provision of notice than is required by the NES, I note that as a result of the NES precedence clause, the provisions of the NES will prevail – particular in relation to, for example, s 107(2)(a) of the Act, which provides that notice may be given after the leave has commenced.
Consideration
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF) and the Health Services Union (HWU), both being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the ANMF and the HWU.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate 7 days after approval.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE529455 PR788527>
ANNEXURE A
- AGLC
- Wickro Pty Ltd ATF The Belmont Property Unit Trust T/A Homestyle Aged Care Services [2025] FWCA 2069
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 2069
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court's reasoning involved a detailed analysis of the bargaining process, the fairness of the terms, and the overall benefit to the employees. It was essential to establish that the agreement was not only negotiated in good faith but also provided a just outcome for the employees. The court considered various aspects, including the nature of the employment, the economic circumstances of the parties, and the terms and conditions proposed in the agreement. After a thorough examination, the court found that the agreement was negotiated fairly and that the terms provided a reasonable and beneficial outcome for the employees. The court was satisfied that the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval.
As a result of the court's decision, the application for the approval of the Homestyle Aged Care Services, ANMF and HWU Enterprise Agreement 2024-2028 was granted. The agreement was deemed to be fair and reasonable, and it was approved under the Fair Work Act 2009. The court's decision ensured that the employees would benefit from the terms outlined in the agreement, and it provided a stable framework for industrial relations within the organisation. The final orders included the approval of the enterprise agreement, allowing it to be implemented and enforced between the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.