WICKRAMAARACHIGE (Migration)
[2019] AATA 4822
•15 October 2019
WICKRAMAARACHIGE (Migration) [2019] AATA 4822 (15 October 2019)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: LAHIRU AKALALANKA PETER WICKRAMAARACHIGE
CASE NUMBER: 1807516
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2018/378262
MEMBER:P. Wood
DATE:15 October 2019
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney, New South Wales
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
Statement made on 15 October 2019 at 5:17pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION –Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – subclass 500 (Student) visa– evidence of English language ability provided – decision under review remittedLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, s 65
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 500.213
STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The applicant applied for the visa on 23 January 2018. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 7 March 2018.
The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of English language ability was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
The applicant has since provided the Tribunal with a copy of a PTE report with an overall score of 79. In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.
DECISION
The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:
·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
P. Wood
Senior Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
0
0
0