WHITTAKER v BAUME

Case

[2010] FMCA 850


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

WHITTAKER v BAUME [2010] FMCA 850
HUMAN RIGHTS – Non-appearance by the parties – whether application should be dismissed. 
Federal Magistrates Court Rules, r.13.03C
Applicant: JOANNE WHITTAKER
Respondent: ROBERT BAUME
File Number: SYG2872 of 2009
Judgment of: Barnes FM
Hearing date: 28 October 2010
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 28 October 2010

REPRESENTATION

Solicitors for the Applicant: No appearance
Solicitors for the Respondent: No appearance

ORDERS

  1. There being no appearance by either party the matter be dismissed pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AT SYDNEY

SYG2872 of 2009

JOANNE WHITTAKER

Applicant

and

ROBERT BAUME

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(Revised from transcript)

  1. This is an application before the court in relation to alleged disability discrimination.  The matter has been before the court on a number of occasions. Mediation was conducted by a registrar of this court on 25 August 2010 and 15 September 2010.  The report of listing for the latter date notes that the matter had settled but that the parties were to enter into consent orders when a deed was executed.  The parties were advised that the matter was listed for directions at 9.30 am on 14 October 2010. 

  2. As at 14 October 2010 no consent orders had been filed.  The parties are legally represented.  Neither party appeared on that day.  Nor did they or their solicitors contact the court. 

  3. Rather than dismissing the matter for non-appearance on 14 October 2010 I adjourned the matter to today, 28 October 2010, and noted that if there was no appearance by either party the matter may be dismissed pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules.

  4. It is regrettable that there has been no appearance for either party today and there is no evidence of any contact by the solicitors for either party with the court to advise as to the present status of this matter. 

  5. In these circumstances I consider it appropriate to dismiss the matter pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules.

I certify that the preceding five (5) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Barnes FM

Associate: 

Date:  3 November 2010

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0