District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: WHITMORE v SIMON [2021] NSWDC 137 Hearing dates: 19 MARCH 2021 Date of orders: 19 MARCH 2021 Decision date: 19 March 2021 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: M Sidis ADCJ Decision: Orders:
(1) The motion filed on behalf of the defendant on 20 December 2020 is dismissed.
(2) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion.
(3) On the plaintiff's application for leave to proceed, I grant leave pursuant to s 109 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act nunc pro tunc to the plaintiff to commence proceedings out of time, noting that those proceedings were commenced on 1 October 2020.
(4) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of that application.
(5) By consent, I make orders in accordance with the consent orders, signed and dated 19 March 2021, noting that the matter will be listed for further directions on 10 August 2020.
Catchwords: PERSONAL INJURY – motor accident – substantial period of delay– applications to dismiss and for leave to commence out of time – minor at time of accident – disadvantage – involvement of alcohol and joint illegal enterprise – serious injuries and disabilities.
Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 ss 66(2), 109
Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Plaintiff:
Frederick John Whitmore
Defendant:
Keenan SimonRepresentation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Plaintiff: Mr L Brazel
Defendant: Mr C Hart
Plaintiff:
Slater and Gordon Lawyers
Defendant:
McCabe Curwood Pty Ltd
File Number(s): 2020/00283839 Publication restriction: nil
Judgment
-
Mr Frederick John Whitmore was injured in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 20 December 2013 when he was 13 years old; he is now 20. His claim for damages for injuries suffered in the accident was forwarded to the insurer of the motor vehicle on 15 August 2019. On about 20 August 2019, an explanation for the delay in lodging the claim was provided to the insurer. The insurer advised the plaintiff's solicitor that it accepted the explanation on 28 February 2020. On 7 April 2020, the insurer advised that it denied liability for the claim. On 26 August 2020, the principal claims assessor for the Motor Accidents Claim Resolution Service issued a certificate that permitted the commencement of proceedings in this Court. A statement of claim was filed on 1 October 2020 in which, in addition to the claim for damages, the plaintiff sought leave pursuant to s 109 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (“the Act”) to commence proceedings out of time. A defence was filed on 16 November 2020 in which issues were raised of joint illegal enterprise, contributory negligence and the absence of leave to commence proceedings.
The applications before the Court
-
By a motion filed on 21 December 2020, the defendant sought to have the proceedings dismissed on the ground that they were commenced without leave, or alternatively, that the proceedings have not been prosecuted with due despatch. The motion came before the Court on 18 March 2020. At the same time, the plaintiff, without objection by…
Continue reading Whitmore v Simon
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Whitmore v Simon [2021] NSWDC 137
- Case
- [2021] NSWDC 137
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the delay in commencing proceedings constituted a sufficient ground for dismissal and whether Whitmore should be granted leave to proceed out of time. The court considered the extent of the delay, the disadvantage to the defendant, and the circumstances of the accident, including the involvement of alcohol and illegal activities.
The court found that, although there had been a substantial delay in bringing the proceedings, the plaintiff’s disadvantage due to being a minor at the time of the accident was significant. The court acknowledged the severe injuries and disabilities resulting from the accident, and the circumstances involving alcohol and illegal activities did not sufficiently prejudice the defendant to warrant dismissal. The court granted the plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed out of time, and dismissed the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The court also ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the motion and the plaintiff to pay the defendant’s costs of the application for leave to proceed.
The orders of the court included dismissing the defendant’s motion, granting leave to the plaintiff to commence proceedings out of time, and making orders in accordance with the consent orders signed and dated 19 March 2021. The matter was listed for further directions on 10 August 2020.
Orders
Orders of the court
Orders:
(1) The motion filed on behalf of the defendant on 20 December 2020 is dismissed.
(2) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of the motion.
(3) On the plaintiff's application for leave to proceed, I grant leave pursuant to s 109 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act nunc pro tunc to the plaintiff to commence proceedings out of time, noting that those proceedings were commenced on 1 October 2020.
(4) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of that application.
(5) By consent, I make orders in accordance with the consent orders, signed and dated 19 March 2021, noting that the matter will be listed for further directions on 10 August 2020.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.