White v QPS

Link copied
Case Copied 10 min read

MAGISTRATES COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

White v QPS [2017] QMC 2

PARTIES:

Tony Stephen White
(Applicant)

V

Queensland Police Service

(Defendant)

FILE NO/S:

MAG-00289571/16(7)

DIVISION:

Magistrates Court

PROCEEDING:

Application for a restricted licence

ORIGINATING COURT:

Rockhampton

DELIVERED ON:

14 March 2017

DELIVERED AT:

Rockhampton

HEARING DATE:

8 March 2017

A/MAGISTRATE:

M Morrow

ORDER:

Application Refused

CATCHWORDS:

Vehicle and traffic – Application for restricted work licence – whether applicant fit and proper person

SOLICITORS:

Mr S Moon instructed by CQ Legal for the Applicant

S/Const S Janes on behalf of the Queensland Police Service

  1. Mr White was arrested on 21 December 2016 and charged with having driven a motor vehicle whilst over the general alcohol limit but not over the middle alcohol limit at Mt Morgan.

  1. He has pleaded guilty to that offence and applies for a restricted driver’s licence under section 87 of the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995 (TORUM Act).

  1. His application is opposed on the basis that he is not a fit and proper person to hold a restricted licence having regard to the safety of other road users and the public generally: section 87(5)(a)(i) TORUM Act. Otherwise he is eligible to apply and satisfies the criteria to obtain a restricted licence.

  1. The charge and application generally came before me on 8 March 2017 and have adjourned proceedings to today for decision of the application and conviction and sentence.

  1. Mr White relies on his affidavits dated 13 February 2017 and 8 March 2017 as well as an affidavit from Rebecca Lyn Miller dated 13 February 2017 as evidence to support his application for a restricted driver’s licence.

  1. Mr White is a 45 year old single man with no dependents.

  1. He is currently employed by Graham Gosper Grade Hire Pty Ltd on a permanent part-time basis since January 2017.

  1. He drives a truck and transports other employees and passengers between jobs, Ms Miller indicates if he is not granted a work licence, they would have to cease his employment as he would be unable to perform the work required and no other positions are available.

  1. The offence took place on 21 December 2016. He had finished working and was drinking at home at Wycarbah when he received a phone call from his sister who lives in Mt Morgan. She indicated she was having an argument with a neighbour and asked him to come over.

  1. Police were performing random breath testing and the Breath Analysis Certificate indicates he had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .094% when he was driving to his sister’s place in Mt Morgan.

  1. Mr White has a four page traffic history which was tendered.

  1. On 28 August 2009 he was convicted in this Court of driving under the influence of liquor or a drug on 28 July 2009 with a reading of .172 BAC.

  1. On 10 April 2007 he was convicted of driving under the influence of liquor or a drug on 1 February 2007 with a reading of .151 BAC.

  1. On…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read White v QPS and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] QMC 2
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of White v QPS was heard in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The applicant, Mr White, sought a restricted work licence to operate a commercial vehicle for his business. The Queensland Police Service (QPS) opposed the application, asserting that Mr White was not a fit and proper person to hold such a licence due to his criminal history. The Tribunal was tasked with determining whether Mr White met the criteria for a restricted work licence and was a fit and proper person to hold it.

The central legal issue before the Tribunal was whether Mr White, given his criminal history and other personal circumstances, was a fit and proper person to hold a restricted work licence. The Tribunal considered the statutory criteria set out in the Transport Operations (Road Use Management) Act 1995, which requires the holder of a restricted work licence to be a fit and proper person. The Tribunal also assessed Mr White's criminal history, employment, and other relevant factors to determine his suitability.

After considering the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Tribunal found that Mr White's criminal history and other personal circumstances made him unfit to hold a restricted work licence. The Tribunal determined that Mr White's past conduct demonstrated a lack of reliability and trustworthiness, which were critical factors in assessing his fitness to hold such a licence. Consequently, the Tribunal refused Mr White's application for a restricted work licence.

Orders

Orders of the court

Application Refused

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.