| CITATION: | Wheeler v Assistant Commissioner Paul Wilson [2013] QCAT 519 |
| PARTIES: | Mr Jason Allen Wheeler (Applicant) |
| v | |
| Assistant Commissioner Paul Wilson (Respondent) |
| APPLICATION NUMBER: | OCR426-12 |
| MATTER TYPE: | Occupational regulation matter |
| HEARING DATE: | 18 July 2013 |
| HEARD AT: | Brisbane |
| DECISION OF: | R F King-Scott, Member Dr B Cullen, Member |
| DELIVERED ON: | 25 September 2013 |
| DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
| ORDERS MADE: | 1. The Respondent’s decision of 10 December 2012 be set aside and in lieu thereof the following decision be substituted. 2. The Applicant be reduced in rank from Senior Constable pay point 2.9 to Senior Constable pay point 2.5 for a period of one year and at the end of the 1 year period, he immediately return to his original rank and salary at Senior Constable 2.9; 3. The reduction in rank be suspended, conditional upon the Applicant: (a) completing 70 hours of community service; |
| CATCHWORDS: | Police officer – misconduct. Off duty police officer a victim of attempted robbery – robbers arrested and one robber subsequently assaulted by the victim whilst he was still in an agitated state – appropriate sanction Crime and Misconduct Act 2000 (Qld) ss 219G, 219H Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) ss 17, 24 Aldrich v Ross [2001] 2 Qd R 235 |
APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):
| APPLICANT: | Mr G Cranny, Solicitor representing Mr Jason Wheeler |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr S McLeod of Counsel representing the Queensland Police Service |
REASONS FOR DECISION
This is an Application to review the decision of Assistant Commissioner Paul Wilson made on 10 December 2012. That decision was made in respect of a charge of misconduct against Senior Constable Jason Wheeler, namely:
That on or about the 14th day of December 2010 at Toowoomba your conduct did not meet the standard of conduct the community reasonably expects of a police officer in that you:
Unlawfully assaulted one X.[1]
[1]Pursuant to a decision of the Tribunal dated 11 March 2013 the names of the juveniles are not to be published.
In relation to this charge, Mr Wheeler accepted the allegation of misconduct at the time of filing his written submissions in response to the initial investigation.
Assistant Commissioner Wilson imposed the following sanction:
a) that the Applicant be reduced in rank from Senior Constable pay 2.9 to Constable pay 1.6 for 2 years and at the end of the 2 year period, he immediately return to his original rank and salary at Senior Constable 2.9;
b) the reduction in rank be suspended for a period of 2 years on condition that the Applicant:
i)does not commit any…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Wheeler v Assistant Commissioner Paul Wilson and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2013] QCAT 519
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Tribunal found that although Senior Constable Wheeler's conduct amounted to misconduct, the sanction imposed by Assistant Commissioner Wilson was too severe. The Tribunal considered the mitigating factors, including that Senior Constable Wheeler had been a victim of an attempted robbery and was still in an agitated state when he returned to the scene and assaulted the complainant. The Tribunal also noted that the assault was minor and did not cause any pain or harm. The Tribunal found that the sanction should reflect the minor nature of the assault and the mitigating factors. The Tribunal substituted a sanction involving a reduction in rank from Senior Constable pay point 2.9 to Senior Constable pay point 2.5 for a period of one year, suspended on conditions including completion of 70 hours of community service and not performing higher duties relieving during the suspension period.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.