Direct the plaintiffs to bring in short minutes of order to give effect to these conclusions, together with any additional submissions, on or before 8 August 2025
Catchwords:
EQUITY — Trusts and trustees — Variation of trusts — s 86A of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) — Application to vary vesting date of trust — Where trust deed of discretionary family trust provides for vesting date in 2032 — Whether proposed variation to trust is in the best interests of beneficiaries — Nature of Court’s power under s 86A — Appropriate form of relief under s 86A
Explanatory Note to the Stronger Communities Legislation Amendment (Courts and Civil) Bill 2020 (NSW)
JD Heydon and MJ Leeming, Jacobs’ Law of Trusts in Australia (8th ed, 2016, LexisNexis Butterworths)
L Tucker, N le Poidevin and J Brightwell, Lewin on Trusts (20th ed, 2020, Sweet & Maxwell)
New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), 16…
Grounds of appeal
[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.
[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.
[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.
Consideration
[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.
[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.
Continue reading WFT Capital Pty Ltd v Windt
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
AGLC
WFT Capital Pty Ltd v Windt [2025] NSWSC 819
Case
[2025] NSWSC 819
Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of WFT Capital Pty Ltd v Windt involves a discretionary family trust where the trust deed specifies a vesting date of 2032. WFT Capital Pty Ltd, as the trustee, sought to vary the vesting date of the trust to an earlier date. The dispute came before the court to determine whether the proposed variation was in the best interests of the beneficiaries. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
The legal issues before the court included whether the variation of the trust's vesting date was appropriate and whether the court's powers under section 86A of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) could be exercised to facilitate such a variation. The court was also required to determine the nature of its power under section 86A and the appropriate form of relief that could be granted in this context.
The court held that the proposed variation of the trust's vesting date was in the best interests of the beneficiaries. The court found that its power under section 86A is broad and can be exercised to achieve a just and equitable outcome for the beneficiaries. The court emphasised that the primary consideration in varying a trust is the best interests of the beneficiaries. The court was satisfied that the trustee had demonstrated that the proposed variation would benefit the beneficiaries and was thus appropriate. The court granted the application to vary the vesting date of the trust to an earlier date.
The court's decision was clear and definitive, providing guidance on the appropriate application of section 86A of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW). The court's order allowed for the variation of the trust's vesting date, reflecting its broad discretion in matters of trust variation.