| [2018] FWCA 4512 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Wetspot Consolidated (VIC) Pty Ltd T/A Wetspot Waterproofing and Tiling
(AG2018/2089)
WETSPOT CONSOLIDATED AND CFMEU (WA) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016-2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER WILSON | MELBOURNE, 1 AUGUST 2018 |
Application for approval of the Wetspot Consolidated and CFMEU (WA) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the Wetspot Consolidated and CFMEU (WA) Enterprise Agreement 2016-2020 (the Agreement). The application was made by Wetspot Consolidated (VIC) Pty Ltd T/A Wetspot Waterproofing and Tiling pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).
[2] This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy and that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 8 August 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE429385 PR609603>
- AGLC
- Wetspot Consolidated (VIC) Pty Ltd T/A Wetspot Waterproofing and Tiling [2018] FWCA 4512
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 4512
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court had to decide included whether the enterprise agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically if it contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions, and if it was fairly negotiated. The court also considered whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it complied with the "better off overall test" to ensure employees were not worse off financially under the new agreement compared to their previous conditions.
The Fair Work Commission found that the enterprise agreement was fairly negotiated and contained all the necessary minimum terms and conditions. The court concluded that the agreement met the "better off overall test" and was in the best interests of the employees. The decision was based on the detailed evidence presented regarding the negotiation process, the financial analysis, and the benefits provided to the employees under the new agreement. The Commission approved the enterprise agreement, ensuring it would come into effect as per the stipulated dates.
No further orders were made by the court beyond the approval of the enterprise agreement. The decision provided clarity for both the employer and the employees, establishing the terms and conditions of employment for the specified period.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.