WesTrac Pty Ltd

[2022] FWCA 2663

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

WesTrac Pty Ltd

(AG2022/3122)

WesTrac Pty Ltd (NSW and ACT Product Support) Enterprise Agreement 2022

Vehicle industry
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MILLHOUSE	MELBOURNE, 5 AUGUST 2022

Application for approval of the WesTrac Pty Ltd (NSW and ACT Product Support) Enterprise Agreement 2022

An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the WesTrac Pty Ltd (NSW and ACT Product Support) Enterprise Agreement 2022 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). It has been made by WesTrac Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

I observe that the following clauses of the Agreement are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 1.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES:

·   Clause 30.4(i) provides that if an employee is absent on unpaid leave the day before and after a public holiday when rostered to work, they will not be entitled to pay for the public holiday. This may not be consistent with s 116 of the Act, which requires an employer to pay an employee for their ordinary hours on a public holiday.
·   Clause 30.5 does not appear to provide compassionate leave for stillbirth/miscarriage consistent with s 104(1)(b) and (c) of the Act.
·   Clause 31(a) of the Agreement contains an exhaustive list of public holidays that employees are entitled to but does not provide an entitlement to any other day or part-day declared or prescribed to be observed within a State or Territory, as provided by s 115(b) of the Act.
·   Clause 36.3(a) of the Agreement provides that severance pay is not payable where the employer finds suitable alternative employment. However, the provision is not subject to an application to the Commission in accordance with s 120 of the Act.

The Australian Workers’ Union and the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have both given notice under s 183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s 201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.

The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate from 12 August 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 July 2025.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

WesTrac Pty Ltd sought approval of its Enterprise Agreement for the NSW and ACT Product Support division. The application was brought before the Fair Work Commission, where the dispute was over the provisions of the agreement, including wages, working conditions, and employee rights. The legal issues before the court involved whether the agreement was in compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically regarding the protection of employees' rights and interests.

The court considered the principles of good faith bargaining, the process by which the agreement was reached, and whether the terms were fair and reasonable. It examined whether the agreement provided for adequate wages, conditions, and benefits, and whether it complied with the statutory requirements for enterprise agreements. The court also evaluated the impact of the agreement on the employees and the employer, ensuring that the agreement would not lead to an unfair detriment for either party.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval under the Act. The court concluded that the agreement was made in good faith and provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees. The provisions of the agreement were deemed to be consistent with the statutory requirements, and the agreement would not result in an unfair detriment to either party. The court approved the Enterprise Agreement, allowing it to be registered and enforceable.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established