Westpac Banking Corporation and Ors v The Bell Group Ltd and Ors
[2014] HCATrans 75
[2014] HCATrans 075
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Perth No P18 of 2013
B e t w e e n -
WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION ACN 007 457 141
First Appellant
SG AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 002 093 021
Second Appellant
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD ACN 004 044 937
Third Appellant
HSBC BANK AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 006 434 162
Fourth Appellant
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK ARBN 097 571 778
Fifth Appellant
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA ACN 123 123 124
Sixth Appellant
LLOYDS TSB BANK PLC
Seventh Appellant
BANCO ESPIRITO SANTO SA
Eighth Appellant
SEB AG
Ninth Appellant
BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC
Tenth Appellant
CREDIT AGRICOLE SA
Eleventh Appellant
UNICREDIT BANK AUSTRIA AG
Twelfth Appellant
CREDIT LYONNAIS
Thirteenth Appellant
COMMERZBANK AG
Fourteenth Appellant
KBC BANK VERZEKERINGS HOLDING NV
Fifteenth Appellant
SKOPBANK
Sixteenth Appellant
DZ BANK AG DEUTSCHE ZENTRAL-GENOSSENSCHAFTSBANK
Seventeenth Appellant
CALYON
Eighteenth Appellant
GENTRA LTD
Nineteenth Appellant
THE GULF BANK KSC
Twentieth Appellant
and
THE BELL GROUP LTD ACN 008 666 993 (IN LIQ)
First Respondent
THE BELL GROUP LTD ACN 008 666 993 (IN LIQ) AS TRUSTEE SEPARATELY FOR EACH OF: DOLFINNE PTY LTD ACN 009 134 516 (IN LIQ), INDUSTRIAL SECURITIES PTY LTD ACN 008 728 792 (IN LIQ), MARANOA TRANSPORT PTY LTD ACN 009 668 393 (IN LIQ), NEOMA INVESTMENTS PTY LTD ACN 009 234 842 (IN LIQ)
Second Respondent
BELL GROUP FINANCE PTY LTD ACN 009 165 182 (IN LIQ) (RECEIVER AND MANAGER APPOINTED)
Third Respondent
BELL GROUP (UK) HOLDINGS LTD (IN LIQ) (IN ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIVERSHIP)
Fourth Respondent
BELL PUBLISHING GROUP PTY LTD ACN 008 704 452 (IN LIQ)
Fifth Respondent
AMBASSADOR NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 009 105 800 (IN LIQ)
Sixth Respondent
BELCAP ENTERPRISES PTY LTD ACN 009 264 537 (IN LIQ)
Seventh Respondent
BELL BROS PTY LTD ACN 008 672 375 (IN LIQ)
Eighth Respondent
BELL EQUITY MANAGEMENT LTD ACN 009 210 208
Ninth Respondent
DOLFINNE PTY LTD ACN 009 134 516 (IN LIQ)
Tenth Respondent
GREAT WESTERN TRANSPORT PTY LTD ACN 009 669 121 (IN LIQ)
Eleventh Respondent
HARLESDEN FINANCE PTY LTD ACN 009 227 561
Twelfth Respondent
INDUSTRIAL SECURITIES PTY LTD ACN 008 728 792 (IN LIQ)
Thirteenth Respondent
MARADOLF LTD ACN 005 482 806 (IN LIQ)
Fourteenth Respondent
MARANOA TRANSPORT PTY LTD ACN 009 668 393 (IN LIQ)
Fifteenth Respondent
WANSTEAD TRANSPORT PTY LTD ACN 008 775 120 (IN LIQ)
Sixteenth Respondent
WESTERN TRANSPORT PTY LTD ACN 009 666 308 (IN LIQ)
Seventeenth Respondent
WIGMORES TRACTORS PTY LTD ACN 008 679 221 (IN LIQ)
Eighteenth Respondent
W & J INVESTMENTS LTD ACN 000 068 888 ( IN LIQ)
Nineteenth Respondent
DOLFINNE SECURITIES PTY LTD ACN 009 218 142 (IN LIQ)
Twentieth Respondent
NEOMA INVESTMENTS PTY LTD ACN 009 234 842 (IN LIQ)
Twenty‑First Respondent
TBGL ENTERPRISES LTD ACN 008 669 216 (IN LIQ)
Twenty‑Second Respondent
WANSTEAD SECURITIES PTY LTD ACN 009 218 160 (IN LIQ)
Twenty‑Third Respondent
WAON INVESTMENTS PTY LTD ACN 008 937 166 (IN LIQ)
Twenty‑Fourth Respondent
WESTERN INTERSTATE PTY LTD ACN 000 224 395 (PROVISIONAL LIQUIDATOR APPOINTED)
Twenty‑Fifth Respondent
GEOFFREY FRANK TOTTERDELL IN HIS CAPACITY AS LIQUIDATOR (WITH ALJ WOODINGS) OF EACH OF THE FIRST, SEVENTH, EIGHTH, NINTH, ELEVENTH, FIFTEENTH, SIXTEENTH, SEVENTEENTH, NINETEENTH, TWENTIETH, TWENTY-SECOND, TWENTY-THIRD AND TWENTY-FITH RESPONDENTS
Twenty‑Sixth Respondent
ANTONY LESLIE JOHN WOODINGS IN HIS CAPACITY AS SOLE LIQUIDATOR OF THE THIRD, FIFTH, TENTH, TWELFTH, THIRTEENTH, FOURTEENTH, EIGHTEENTH, TWENTY-FIRST AND TWENTY-FOUTH RESPONDENTS AND AS LIQUIDATOR (WITH GF TOTTERDELL) OF EACH OF THE FIRST, SEVENTH, EIGHTH, NINTH, ELEVENTH, FIFTEENTH, SIXTEENTH, SEVENTEENTH, NINETEENTH, TWENTIETH, TWENTY-SECOND, TWENTY-THIRD AND TWENTY-FIFTH RESPONDENTS
Twenty‑Seventh Respondent
THE LAW DEBENTURE TRUST CORPORATION PLC AS TRUSTEE OF THE BGNV TRUSTS AS DEFINED IN THE SCHEDULE TO THE WRIT OF SUMMONS IN CIV 1464 OF 2000
Twenty‑Eighth Respondent
Directions hearing
FRENCH CJ
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT CANBERRA ON THURSDAY, 10 APRIL 2014, AT 10.29 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
____________________
MR A.C. ARCHIBALD, QC: I appear with MR N.J. OWENS for the appellants, your Honour. (instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills)
MR C.G. COLVIN, SC: If your Honour pleases, with my learned friend, MR D.J. JACKSON, I appear for the respondents. (instructed by Ashurst Australia)
HIS HONOUR: Mr Archibald.
MR ARCHIBALD: Your Honour will have seen from the affidavits of Mr Paynter, which I read, that all but one of the conditions precedent to the settlement of the matter were satisfied by 22 January of this year. One remaining condition precedent is still to be satisfied and that is taking longer than had been anticipated originally ‑ ‑ ‑
HIS HONOUR: There is an application tomorrow, I think, is there not, in the English ‑ ‑ ‑
MR ARCHIBALD: Yes, your Honour. It involves approval for the trustee of the bonds to enter into the deed. There were two original avenues whereby that condition precedent might have been satisfied: one, bondholder vote; the other, court approval. The second route is now being adopted and a final hearing of the matter is to be held in London tomorrow, London time. The evidence indicates that it is anticipated that the court will be asked to deliver judgment as soon as possible with the hope that that might be achieved before Easter. If that is so, one will know by mid‑May whether the condition precedent is satisfied for the condition precedent turns upon a final order of what is called in the deed of settlement “the English High Court or an appellate court entertaining an appeal from that court”. The evidence indicates there is an appeal period of 21 days and seven days to notify of the appeal, so 28 days after judgment is given one should know that the condition precedent has been satisfied. That will take one until ‑ ‑ ‑
HIS HONOUR: Thank you for that, Mr Archibald. I have read the affidavits, of course. I think the form of order last made was adjourn for not less than six months which is something that ‑ ‑ ‑
MR ARCHIBALD: Yes, I was a little embarrassed to see that. I am sure the sense of the order in the way it would be read was for a finite period rather than an infinite period.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, well, I am going to revert to my old Federal Court habits and fix a date upon which the matter will come back, but I want to make sufficient allowance for contingencies.
MR ARCHIBALD: Yes, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: So diverting as would be, of course, to relist the whole thing for hearing. It seems to me that if I were to list the matter again at 9.30 on 4 August, which is the beginning of our August sittings – of course, if everything is tied up before then, then appropriate finalisation notices can be filed. Do you have any difficulty with that?
MR ARCHIBALD: No, your Honour. We specified a late June date, mindful of the July vacation period, but August would be far more satisfactory. There may be a little slippage and 4 August would certainly suit the appellants.
HIS HONOUR: Yes, all right. Mr Colvin.
MR COLVIN: We agree with that submission, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: I suppose it is your summons really, is it not?
MR ARCHIBALD: Yes, it is, your Honour.
HIS HONOUR: The summons is stood over to Monday, 4 August at 9.30 and will be in Canberra, but by video link, of course, if it is necessary to do that. Thank you. The Court will now adjourn.
AT 10.33 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Insolvency
-
Equity & Trusts
Legal Concepts
-
Fiduciary Duty
-
Remedies
-
Appeal
-
Limitation Periods
-
Damages
0
0
0