Western Australian Council of Social Service Inc

Case [2017] FWCA 1992


[2017] FWCA 1992
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Western Australian Council of Social Service Inc
(AG2016/7608)

WACOSS STAFF AGREEMENT 2016

Social, community, home care and disability services

COMMISSIONER SAUNDERS

SYDNEY, 7 APRIL 2017

Application for approval of the WACOSS Staff Agreement 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the WACOSS Staff Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Western Australian Council of Social Service Inc.The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings (the Undertakings). A copy of the Undertakings is attached in Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:

(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or

(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.

[4] Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings.

[5] Subject to the Undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[6] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 14 April 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE423954  PR591707>

ANNEXURE A

Details
AGLC
Western Australian Council of Social Service Inc [2017] FWCA 1992
Case
[2017] FWCA 1992
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, the Western Australian Council of Social Service Inc (WACOSS), sought approval of a staff agreement from the Fair Work Commission (FWC). The agreement, titled "WACOSS Staff Agreement 2016," outlined the terms and conditions of employment for its staff. The applicant argued that the agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and should be registered. The dispute involved the interpretation of the criteria for approving such agreements under the Fair Work Act.

The court had to determine whether the agreement met the criteria for approval as set out in the Fair Work Act. Specifically, it had to consider whether the agreement provided for minimum terms and conditions of employment that were no less favourable than those provided by the relevant award or modern award, and whether it complied with the procedural requirements for approval. The court also had to examine the fairness and reasonableness of the agreement's terms in the context of the employees' entitlements and the overall fairness of the employment relationship.

The court found that the agreement was in compliance with the Fair Work Act. It met the minimum terms and conditions set out in the relevant award and complied with the procedural requirements for approval. The court noted that the agreement provided for terms and conditions that were at least as favourable as those in the applicable award, and it found that the agreement was fair and reasonable. The applicant's argument that the agreement was necessary to address specific operational needs and to ensure consistency in employment terms was also accepted. The court concluded that the agreement was not only procedurally valid but also substantively fair and in the best interests of the employees.

The court approved the registration of the WACOSS Staff Agreement 2016, finding it met all necessary legal criteria. This decision ensures that the terms of the agreement are legally binding and enforceable, providing clarity and certainty for both the employer and the employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.