Legal Research
Cases
West v Victorian WorkCover Authority

West v Victorian WorkCover Authority

Case [2019] VCC 703

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: West v Victorian WorkCover Authority [2019] VCC 703
Case: [2019] VCC 703
Decision Date: 23 May 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

West v Victorian WorkCover Authority [2019] VCC 703

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Haidar v Transport Accident Commission [2016] VSCA 182
Citation 1

…d to more recently by the Court of Appeal in Papamanos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] VSCA 167 and in Haidar v Transport Accident Commission [2016] VSCA 182 . Bearing the above in mind, I accept the plaintiff’s evidence, both oral and in his supporting affidavits, in relation to his pain and suffering.…
Papamanos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] VSCA 167
Citation 2

…This observation has been referred to more recently by the Court of Appeal in Papamanos v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] VSCA 167 and in Haidar v Transport Accident Commission [2016] VSCA 182 . Bearing the above in mind, I accept the plaintiff’s evidence, both oral and in his supporting affidavits, in relat…
Transport Accident Commission v Kamel [2011] VSCA 110
Citation 3

…n a daily basis is a factor of some importance, as has been discussed in Haden Engineering v McKinnon (2010) 31 VR 1 , Sutton v Laminex Group Pty Ltd (2011) 31 VR 100 and other cases. As was said by Dobbs-Streeton JA in Kelso v Tatiara Meat Company Pty Ltd [2007] VSCA 267:…
Sutton v Laminex Group Pty Ltd [2011] VSCA 52
Citation 4

…The experience of pain on a daily basis is a factor of some importance, as has been discussed in Haden Engineering v McKinnon (2010) 31 VR 1 , Sutton v Laminex Group Pty Ltd (2011) 31 VR 100 and other cases. As was said by Dobbs-Streeton JA in Kelso v Tatiara Meat Company Pty Ltd [2007] VSCA 267:…
Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd v Kelso [2010] VSCA 12
Citation 5

…The experience of pain on a daily basis is a factor of some importance, as has been discussed in Haden Engineering v McKinnon (2010) 31 VR 1 , Sutton v Laminex Group Pty Ltd (2011) 31 VR 100 and other cases. As was said by Dobbs-Streeton JA in Kelso v Tatiara Meat Company Pty Ltd [2007] VSCA 267:…
Dwyer v Calco Timbers Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] VSCA 260
Citation 6

…rgely, remained in employment. This is not something which should count against him. As was said by Nettle JA in Dwyer v Calco Timbers Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] VSCA 260:…
Kelso v Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd [2007] VSCA 267
Citation 7

…) 31 VR 1 , Sutton v Laminex Group Pty Ltd (2011) 31 VR 100 and other cases. As was said by Dobbs-Streeton JA in Kelso v Tatiara Meat Company Pty Ltd [2007] VSCA 267:…

AI Chat coming soon