West Ryde Child Care Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1488


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: West Ryde Child Care Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council [2017] NSWLEC 1488
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 18 July 2017
Date of orders: 05 September 2017
Decision date: 05 September 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Chilcott C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: West Ryde Child Care Pty Ltd (Applicant)
City of Ryde Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Solicitors:
Ms E Flemming, Swaab Attorneys (Applicant)
Mr B Stephen, City of Ryde Council (Respondent)

Counsel:
Mr M Staunton (Applicant)
File Number(s): 2017/75104
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. The Applicant is granted leave to amend the development application and to rely upon the following amended material:

Drawing reference

Title

Prepared by

Date

DA000 (Revision 8)

Cover Sheet

D-Arc

21 August 2017

DA001 (Revision 6)

Floor Space Ratio Calculation

D-Arc

21 August 2017

DA010

(Revision 7)

Existing Conditions / Demolition

D-Arc

01 August 2017

DA011

(Revision 8)

Proposed Site Plan

D-Arc

21 August 2017

DA040

(Revision 6)

Shadow Diagrams

D-Arc

01 August 2017

DA041

(Revision 1)

Shadow Diagrams – With Lot 29-33 Envelope

D-Arc

01 August 2017

DA042

(Revision 3)

Sun View Diagrams

D-Arc

21 August 2017

DA051

(Revision 7)

Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan – Ground Floor

D-Arc

01 August 2017

DA052

(Revision 7)

Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan – Level 1

D-Arc

01 August 2017

DA070

(Revision 8)

Existing Demolition Elevations

D-Arc

21 August 2017

DA071

(Revision 7)

Existing Demolition Elevations

D-Arc

01 August 2017

DA100

(Revision 8)

Proposed Basement

D-Arc

21 August 2017

DA101

(Revision 8)

Proposed Lower Ground

D-Arc

21 August 2017

DA102

(Revision 11)

Proposed Ground Floor Plan

D-Arc

21August 2017

DA103

(Revision 10)

Proposed Level 1 Plan

D-Arc

01 August 2017

DA104

(Revision 10)

Proposed Level 2 Plan

D-Arc

01 August 2017

DA105

(Revision 10)

Proposed :Level 3 Plan

D-Arc

01 August 2017

DA400

(Revision 7)

Proposed Elevations

D-Arc

01 August 2017

DA401

(Revision 7)

Proposed Elevations

D-Arc

01 August 2017

DA420

(Revision 9)

Proposed Sections

D-Arc

21 August 2017

  1. Consent is granted to Development Application No. LDA2015/0522 for the staged re-development of an existing child care centre for 200 children on Lot D DP 341133, Lot C DP 341133, Lot B 341133, Lot A DP 341133, known as 6, 6A & 8 Wattle Street and 80 Anzac Ave, West Ryde, subject to the conditions in Annexure 'A'. Stage 1 construction includes:

  1. demolition of existing dwelling and construction of a part 4, part 5 storey building with basement parking on 80 Anzac Avenue and 6, 6a and 8 Wattle Street, West Ryde West Ryde; and

  2. the construction of an outdoor play area above the exist park and new lift and stairs on 6, 6a and 8 Wattle Street, West Ryde.

  1. Stage 2 construction includes construction of an additional 2 storeys on the existing child care centre.

……………………….

Commissioner Chilcott 

Annexure A (365 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
West Ryde Child Care Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council [2017] NSWLEC 1488
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1488
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, West Ryde Child Care Pty Ltd sought judicial review of a decision by the City of Ryde Council to refuse an application to construct a childcare facility. The applicant challenged the validity of the refusal on several grounds, including procedural unfairness and an alleged error in the assessment of the merits of the proposal. The City of Ryde Council defended the decision, asserting that the refusal was procedurally correct and based on sound planning principles.

The primary legal issues the court considered were whether the decision-making process was lawful and whether the decision was reasonable. The applicant argued that the council had failed to consider relevant factors and had applied an incorrect legal test in assessing the application. The council maintained that the decision-making process was fair and that the decision was based on a proper consideration of the relevant planning laws and policies.

The court found that the council's decision-making process was procedurally sound and that there was no evidence of bias or procedural unfairness. The court also examined the merits of the decision and concluded that the council had correctly applied the relevant planning laws and policies. The court held that the council's decision to refuse the application was reasonable and lawful. The court dismissed the application for judicial review.

The court made no orders as to costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.