| [2017] FWCA 5675 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Wesfarmers Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd
(AG2017/3614)
Wesfarmers Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd Kwinana Depot Enterprise Agreement 2017
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| Commissioner Wilson | MELBOURNE, 2 NOVEMBER 2017 |
Application for approval of the Wesfarmers Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd Kwinana Depot Enterprise Agreement 2017.
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Wesfarmers Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd Kwinana Depot Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Wesfarmers Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 9 November 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 8 November 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE425937 PR597285>
ANNEXURE A
- AGLC
- Wesfarmers Kleenheat Gas Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 5675
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 5675
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the agreement contained all the necessary minimum terms and conditions as stipulated by the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the court had to determine if the agreement was made in good faith and if it was free from any improper influence or coercion. The court also examined whether the agreement complied with the statutory requirement for direct communication with employees and if the employees had an opportunity to be directly involved in the agreement's development.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement contained all the necessary minimum terms and conditions and was made in good faith. The court concluded that the agreement was not influenced by any improper factors and that employees had an opportunity to be directly involved in the agreement's development. The Commission approved the agreement, noting that it met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act. The company's application for approval was therefore granted.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.