Wentworth v New South Wales Bar Association
[1992] HCATrans 351
..
4
'I
'
~
•
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Sydney No Sl63 of 1991 B e t w e e n -
KATHERINE WENTWORTH
Applicant
and
NEW SOUTH WALES BAR ASSOCIATION
Respondent
For mention
MASON CJ
BRENNAN J
DEANE J
DAWSON J
TOOHEY J
GAUDRON J
McHUGH J
| Wentworth(3) | 83 | 8/12/92 |
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT CANBERRA ON TUESDAY, 8 DECEMBER 1992, AT 10.24 AM
(Continued from 6/3/92)
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
BRENNAN J: This matter was heard and decided by a Court
constituted by Justices Deane, Dawson, Toohey,
Gaudron and myself. The Court has considered the appellant's solicitors written submissions in
support of an application for a variation of the
order for costs made on 3 June 1992 when the appeal
was dismissed. No good reason is shown why the ordinary rule that costs follow the event should
not prevail.
Accordingly, the order for costs made on
3 June 1992 will stand. I publish a note of what I have just said.
AT 10.24 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE
| Wentworth(3) | 84 | 8/12/92 |
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Judicial Review
0
0
0