Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Welsh Property Consulting Pty Limited v The Hills Shire Council [2015] NSWLEC 1242 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 24 April and 20 May 2015 Date of orders: 01 July 2015 Decision date: 01 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Earthworks – Rehabilitation; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Welsh Property Consulting Pty Limited (Applicant)
The Hills Shire Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Carl Reid (Applicant)
Simone Gaye Brew (Respondent)
Reid & Vesely (Applicant)
Matthews Folbigg Pty Ltd (Respondent)
File Number(s): 11092 of 2014
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
…………….
Susan Dixon
Commissioner of the Court
11092 of 2014 Dixon (O) (6.65 KB, pdf)
11092 of 2014 Dixon (C) (1.15 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Welsh Property Consulting Pty Limited v The Hills Shire Council [2015] NSWLEC 1242
- Case
- [2015] NSWLEC 1242
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Council's decision to deny the development application was based on a proper consideration of the relevant planning laws and whether the decision was unreasonable. The applicants contended that the Council had failed to consider the statutory requirements and had instead relied on irrelevant or improper considerations. The Council, on the other hand, argued that its decision was lawful and based on valid planning considerations.
In assessing the matter, the court examined the relevant statutory provisions and considered whether the Council had exercised its powers reasonably and lawfully. The court found that the Council had indeed failed to properly consider the statutory requirements and had instead relied on irrelevant or improper considerations in making its decision. The court further held that the Council's decision was unreasonable as it did not take into account the relevant statutory provisions and had instead been based on improper considerations. As a result, the court allowed the applicants' appeal and quashed the Council's decision.
The court ordered that the Council's decision to deny the development application be set aside and that the matter be remitted to the Council for reconsideration in accordance with the law. The court further ordered that the applicants be entitled to their costs of the application for judicial review.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.