Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Wells v The Owners - Strata Plan No 12159 [2022] NSWCATCD 151 Hearing dates: 14 June 2022 Date of orders: 15 August 2022 Decision date: 15 August 2022 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: G Sarginson, Senior Member Decision: (1) By ten (10) weeks from the date of this decision, The Owners - Strata Plan No 12159 is to cause the performance of the works set out in the scope of works contained in the quotation of Northern Beaches Drainage Pty Ltd dated 19 August 2021.
(2) The work in order 1 is to be performed by suitably licenced and insured tradespersons exercising due care and skill.
(3) The applicant is to provide reasonable access to his Lot to the extent necessary for order 1 to be complied with.
Catchwords: LAND LAW---Strata title---Common property---Duty to repair---Breach of duty---Scope of works to repair
Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)
Cases Cited: The Owners - Strata Plan No 33368 v Gittins [2022] NSWCATAP 130
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gordon Wells (Applicant)
The Owners - Strata Plan No 12159 (Respondent)Representation: Applicant (self-represented)
C Greenough, Chairperson strata committee
(Respondent)
File Number(s): SC 22/18157 Publication restriction: Nil
REASONS FOR DECISION
-
The proceedings involve a longstanding dispute between the applicant (the owner of Lot 14) and the respondent (the owners corporation) regarding allegedly inadequate drainage and waterproofing causing water ingress to an underground basement garage.
-
The hearing occurred on 14 June 2022. The applicant appeared in person with a “friend” Ms George (Ms George did not seek to represent the applicant; and he presented his own evidence and arguments to the Tribunal). Ms Greenough, Chairperson of the strata committee, represented the respondent. Ms Greenough appeared by video-link.
-
Neither party sought an adjournment of the hearing. No expert witnesses were required for cross examination. Oral evidence and submissions were given by the applicant and Ms Greenough.
-
As noted in procedural directions on 17 May 2022, the only order sought by the applicant in the proceedings was an order for repairs on the basis that the respondent was non-compliant with its duty to keep and maintain common property in a state of good and serviceable repair under s 106 (1) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) (‘the SSM Act’).
-
The walls of the underground garage; and landscaped areas proximate to the garage (involving lawns, shrubs, gardens and paths) are common property. The relevant internal area of the underground garage pertaining to Lot 14 is Lot property; although the garage contains parking spaces for other Lot owners (which are part of their Lot property) and visitors parking (which is common property).
-
The applicant purchased his Lot in about 1982 and resides in the strata building. The strata building was constructed in about 1977.
-
According to the applicant, for many years the respondent has failed to perform repairs to inadequate drainage and waterproofing of the wall…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Wells v The Owners Strata Plan No 12159 and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2022] NSWCATCD 151
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was the determination of the scope of works required to remedy the damage to the common property and whether the respondent had a duty to undertake those works. The court had to consider the obligations of the respondent under the Strata Titles Act 1985 (NSW) and relevant case law, particularly regarding the maintenance and repair of common property within a strata scheme. The court also examined whether the refusal to undertake the recommended works constituted a breach of the respondent's duty.
In delivering judgment, the court found that the respondent had indeed breached its duty to repair the common property. The evidence presented indicated that the drainage system was in need of repair and that the respondent's refusal to undertake the works as recommended by a licensed tradesperson constituted a breach of their statutory obligations. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that repairs are carried out by suitably qualified and insured tradespersons exercising due care and skill. The court ordered that the respondent must engage licensed and insured tradespersons to perform the repair works within the specified timeframe. The applicant was also required to provide reasonable access to his lot to facilitate the execution of these works.
The court's final orders mandated that within ten weeks from the date of the decision, the respondent must undertake the repair works as outlined in the quotation provided by Northern Beaches Drainage Pty Ltd. The repairs must be carried out by suitably licensed and insured tradespersons exercising due care and skill. Additionally, the applicant must provide reasonable access to his lot to allow for the completion of these works.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) By ten (10) weeks from the date of this decision, The Owners - Strata Plan No 12159 is to cause the performance of the works set out in the scope of works contained in the quotation of Northern Beaches Drainage Pty Ltd dated 19 August 2021.
(2) The work in order 1 is to be performed by suitably licenced and insured tradespersons exercising due care and skill.
(3) The applicant is to provide reasonable access to his Lot to the extent necessary for order 1 to be complied with.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.