WELLARD & CLAPTON

Case [2020] FamCA 642


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

WELLARD & CLAPTON [2020] FamCA 642

FAMILY LAW – NULLITY – Where the parties underwent a marriage ceremony in Country B in 2014 – Where the parties held the belief the ceremony was not recognised under Country B law – Where the parties underwent a marriage ceremony in Australia in 2018 – Where the parties jointly sought a divorce of their Australian marriage – Whether the parties were validly married in Country B – Where the Court finds the Country B marriage is a valid marriage – Whether the Australian marriage was void – Consideration on the prohibition of second marriage ceremonies – Where the circumstances do not fall within section 23B(1) of the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) – Where the Australian marriage must still be void – Orders.

FAMILY LAW – DIVORCE – Divorce Order – Where the parties filed a joint Application for Divorce – Where the parties were validly married in Country B in 2014 – Divorce granted. 

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 51, 55A, 102
Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) ss 23, 23B, 88C(1)(a), 88D(1), 88G(1), 88G(3), 113(1)
Kapadia & Kapadia (1991) FLC 92-245
APPLICANT: Ms Wellard
RESPONDENT: Mr Clapton
FILE NUMBER: ADC 105 of 2020
DATE DELIVERED: 20 July 2020
PLACE DELIVERED: Adelaide
PLACE HEARD: Adelaide
JUDGMENT OF: Berman J
HEARING DATE: 20 July 2020

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Litigant in person
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT:
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Litigant in person
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT:

UPON NOTING the following:

(a)That the parties have paid a fee upon the filing of an Application for Divorce filed 11 January 2020;

(b)Upon the Court making a declaration of nullity with respect to the marriage ceremony that occurred on 5 August 2018; and

(c)Upon the parties’ intention to file an application for dissolution of their Country B marriage solemnised on 15 August 2014, it is the view of the Court that the parties should be relieved of any further filing fee.

Orders

  1. That the marriage between Mr Clapton and Ms Wellard solemnised in Australia on … 2018 be declared null and void.

  2. That the Application for Divorce filed 11 January 2020 be dismissed.

  3. That the marriage certificate evidencing the marriage of the parties on … 2014 at City C, Country B be Exhibit “1” in the proceedings. 

  4. A divorce order be made in respect of the marriage of the parties solemnised on … 2014 in City C, Country B.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym  Wellard & Clapton has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant…

Continue reading WELLARD & CLAPTON

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
WELLARD & CLAPTON [2020] FamCA 642
Case
[2020] FamCA 642
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Family Court of Australia, Ms Wellard and Mr Clapton sought a divorce of their Australian marriage solemnised in 2018. However, the central dispute revolved around the validity of a prior marriage ceremony conducted in Country B in 2014, which the parties believed was not legally recognised in that jurisdiction.

The court was required to determine whether the parties were validly married in Country B in 2014, and consequently, whether their subsequent Australian marriage in 2018 was void. The court also considered the prohibition against second marriage ceremonies and whether the circumstances of the Australian marriage fell within the provisions of section 23B(1) of the *Marriage Act 1961* (Cth).

Berman J found that the marriage ceremony conducted in Country B in 2014 constituted a valid marriage under the laws of that country. His Honour reasoned that the Australian marriage in 2018 was therefore void, as it contravened the prohibition against bigamy, even though the specific circumstances did not strictly fall within the exceptions enumerated in section 23B(1) of the *Marriage Act 1961* (Cth).

Consequently, the court declared the marriage solemnised in Australia in 2018 to be null and void and dismissed the parties' joint application for a divorce of that marriage. A divorce order was made in respect of the valid marriage solemnised in Country B in 2014.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That the marriage between Mr Clapton and Ms Wellard solemnised in Australia on … 2018 be declared null and void.

2.

That the Application for Divorce filed 11 January 2020 be dismissed.

3.

That the marriage certificate evidencing the marriage of the parties on … 2014 at City C, Country B be Exhibit “1” in the proceedings.

4.

A divorce order be made in respect of the marriage of the parties solemnised on … 2014 in City C, Country B.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.