Weldemichael v Id Sales and Repairs Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

WELDEMICHAEL

v

ID SALES AND REPAIRS PTY LTD

[2019] HCASL 223
M61/2019

  1. This application for special leave to appeal does not identify a basis to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria.  The application should be dismissed.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman
14 August 2019
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Weldemichael v Id Sales and Repairs Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] HCASL 223
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Weldemichael v Id Sales and Repairs Pty Ltd involved a dispute between the applicant, Weldemichael, and the respondent, Id Sales and Repairs Pty Ltd. The dispute originated from a decision made by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria, which was subsequently challenged by the applicant through an application for special leave to appeal. The central issue in this case was whether the applicant's application for special leave to appeal identified a basis to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court of Appeal.

The legal issue before the court was whether the applicant's application for special leave to appeal met the threshold requirement of identifying a basis to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision. The court considered whether the application adequately demonstrated that there was a reasonable possibility that the decision of the Court of Appeal was incorrect.

The court found that the applicant's application for special leave to appeal did not meet the necessary threshold. The court concluded that the application did not provide a sufficient basis to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision. The court determined that there was no reasonable possibility that the decision of the Court of Appeal was incorrect, and therefore, the application for special leave to appeal should be dismissed. The judges Keane and Edelman directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.