WELDEMICHAEL
v
ID SALES AND REPAIRS PTY LTD
[2019] HCASL 223
M61/2019
This application for special leave to appeal does not identify a basis to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria. The application should be dismissed.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman 14 August 2019
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Weldemichael v Id Sales and Repairs Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] HCASL 223
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the court was whether the applicant's application for special leave to appeal met the threshold requirement of identifying a basis to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision. The court considered whether the application adequately demonstrated that there was a reasonable possibility that the decision of the Court of Appeal was incorrect.
The court found that the applicant's application for special leave to appeal did not meet the necessary threshold. The court concluded that the application did not provide a sufficient basis to doubt the correctness of the Court of Appeal's decision. The court determined that there was no reasonable possibility that the decision of the Court of Appeal was incorrect, and therefore, the application for special leave to appeal should be dismissed. The judges Keane and Edelman directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.