Weatherburn v The King

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

WEATHERBURN

v

THE KING

[2024] HCASL 132
M20/2024

  1. The applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal from part of the judgment of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria (McLeish, Taylor and Kaye JJA) which dismissed the applicant's appeal against sentence imposed by the County Court of Victoria (Judge Tinney).

  2. The proposed appeal lacks sufficient prospects of success, and it is not in the interests of the administration of justice generally, or in this case, to grant special leave to appeal. It would be futile to grant the extension of time.

  3. Special leave to appeal is refused.

    Gageler CJ
    Gordon J
    Edelman J
    Steward J 
    Gleeson J
    Jagot J
    Beech-Jones J

    9 May 2024

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Weatherburn v The King and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] HCASL 132
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Weatherburn brought an application for an extension of time to seek special leave to appeal against the dismissal of his appeal against sentence. The Supreme Court of Victoria's Court of Appeal had previously dismissed his appeal against the sentence imposed by the County Court of Victoria. Weatherburn sought an extension of time on the grounds that the proposed appeal had sufficient prospects of success and was in the interests of the administration of justice. The High Court was required to determine whether the application for an extension of time should be granted.

The court considered the criteria for granting special leave to appeal, which include the prospects of success and the interests of the administration of justice. The court found that the proposed appeal lacked sufficient prospects of success, as it did not present a significant question of law of general public importance. Additionally, the court found that it was not in the interests of the administration of justice to grant special leave to appeal. The court concluded that granting an extension of time would be futile, as it would not lead to a successful appeal.

The High Court refused the application for an extension of time, finding that the proposed appeal lacked sufficient prospects of success and was not in the interests of the administration of justice. The court's decision was based on the specific circumstances of this case, and it did not set a precedent for other cases. The refusal of special leave to appeal meant that the decision of the Supreme Court of Victoria's Court of Appeal stood, and Weatherburn's appeal against the sentence imposed by the County Court of Victoria was dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.