FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Waterproofing Technologies Pty Limited v Perri (No 4) [2025] FCA 985
File number(s): NSD 660 of 2021 Judgment of: MOORE J Date of judgment: 20 August 2025 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to add cross-respondents and new causes of action to cross-claim – where applicants have standing to object to joinder as it may affect the conduct of their existing claims – whether proposed pleadings are properly pleaded or particularised – application granted subject to certain pleadings being removed Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 550
Long Service Leave Act 2018 (Vic) s 9(2)
Cases cited: Waterproofing Technologies Pty Limited v Perri (No 3) [2025] FCA 934 Division: General Division Registry: New South Wales National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency Number of paragraphs: 16 Date of hearing: 1 May 2025 Counsel for the Applicants: Mr J Simpkins Solicitor for the Applicants: McCabes Lawyers Counsel for the First, Second, Third, Sixth, Eighth and Eleventh Respondents: Mr S Horgan KC with Mr A Ford Solicitor for the First, Second, Third, Sixth, Eighth and Eleventh Respondents: Greenwich Legal Counsel for the Ninth Respondent: Mr L Magowan Solicitor for the Respondents: Schembri + McCluskys ORDERS
NSD 660 of 2021 BETWEEN: WATERPROOFING TECHNOLOGIES PTY LTD ACN 152 481 215
First Applicant
POLYSEAL WATERPROOFING VICTORIA PTY LTD ACN 086 669 650
Second Applicant
AND: LUIGI PERRI
First Respondent
CCBM BARE PTY LTD ACN 162 850 731
Second Respondent
MILLENIUM HOMES PTY LTD ACN 096 371 667 (and others named in the Schedule)
Third Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER:
20 AUGUST 2025
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The ninth respondent have leave to join the following persons as cross-respondents to his cross-claim:
(a)Ms Betty Augerinos as tenth cross-respondent;
(b)Mr Graham Athanaseris as eleventh cross-respondent; and
(c)Mr Arthur Balayannis as twelfth cross-respondent.
2.The ninth respondent have leave to file and serve an amended notice of cross-claim and amended statement of cross-claim in the form annexed to his interlocutory application dated 28 March 2025, but with sub-paragraphs 153(b) and 153(d) removed.
3.There be no order as to costs of the ninth respondent’s interlocutory application dated 28 March 2025.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
MOORE J:
These reasons follow on from, and are to be read with, Waterproofing Technologies Pty Limited v Perri (No 3) [2025] FCA 934 (Waterproofing No 3). They concern what was defined in Waterproofing No 3 as the second interlocutory application, which is brought by the ninth respondent, Mr Ilic, and which seeks orders joining three cross-respondents to the cross-claim (Ms Betty Augerinos, Mr Graham Athanaseris and Mr Arthur Balayannis) and granting leave to file an amended notice of cross-claim and amended statement of cross-claim with amendments relating to the joinder.
As described in Waterproofing No 3, there have been many interlocutory applications in these proceedings. The proceedings are set down for final hearing…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Waterproofing Technologies Pty Limited v Perri (No 4) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] FCA 985
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court held that Mr Ilic had standing to object to the joinder as it may affect the conduct of his existing claims. The Court also found that while the proposed pleadings were generally well-drafted, certain sub-paragraphs needed to be removed to ensure they were properly pleaded and particularised. Specifically, sub-paragraphs 153(b) and 153(d) of the proposed Amended Statement of Cross-Claim were deemed insufficiently detailed and were therefore not permitted. The Court granted Mr Ilic leave to join the additional cross-respondents and to file the amended notice of cross-claim and amended statement of cross-claim, subject to the removal of the specified sub-paragraphs. Given that both parties achieved some measure of success in the interlocutory application, the Court ordered that there be no order as to costs for the application.
Consequently, the Court's orders were that Mr Ilic could join Ms Betty Augerinos, Mr Graham Athanaseris, and Mr Arthur Balayannis as cross-respondents to his cross-claim. He was also permitted to file and serve an amended notice of cross-claim and amended statement of cross-claim, with the specified sub-paragraphs removed. No order was made as to the costs of the ninth respondent's interlocutory application.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The ninth respondent have leave to join the following persons as cross-respondents to his cross-claim:
(a) Ms Betty Augerinos as tenth cross-respondent;
(b) Mr Graham Athanaseris as eleventh cross-respondent; and
(c) Mr Arthur Balayannis as twelfth cross-respondent.
2. The ninth respondent have leave to file and serve an amended notice of cross-claim and amended statement of cross-claim in the form annexed to his interlocutory application dated 28 March 2025, but with sub-paragraphs 153(b) and 153(d) removed.
3. There be no order as to costs of the ninth respondent’s interlocutory application dated 28 March 2025.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.