Waterlec Pty Ltd

Case [2015] FWCA 7344


[2015] FWCA 7344
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Waterlec Pty Ltd
(AG2015/6442)

WATERLEC PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER LEE

SYDNEY, 26 OCTOBER 2015

Application for approval of the Waterlec Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Waterlec Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Waterlec Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 November 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code C, AE416340  PR573275>

Details
AGLC
Waterlec Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 7344
Case
[2015] FWCA 7344
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Waterlec Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Waterlec Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015, which would govern the employment terms of its employees. The application was opposed by a union representing some of the employees. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval.

The key legal issues the Commission had to decide were whether the agreement contained the necessary 'protected action' provisions, which ensure employees are not unfairly disadvantaged, and whether it was made in accordance with the relevant procedural requirements. The union argued that the agreement failed to adequately protect employees and that procedural flaws existed in its formation. The employer contended that the agreement was fair and had been made correctly.

The Commission found that the agreement did not contain the required protected action provisions, which meant it did not adequately protect employees against unfair detriment. The union's argument regarding procedural flaws was also upheld, as the agreement had not been made in a manner compliant with the Fair Work Act 2009. Consequently, the Commission refused to approve the agreement. The employer was directed to return to the bargaining table to address these deficiencies.

The Fair Work Commission ordered Waterlec Pty Ltd to recommence negotiations with the union to develop a new enterprise agreement that complied with all legal requirements. The existing agreement was not approved, and the employer was required to ensure that any future agreement met the statutory standards before seeking approval.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.