FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| WASILENIA v DCT | [2003] FMCA 8 |
| BANKRUPTCY – Application to set aside bankruptcy notice – where service was deemed inadequate by creditor–– extension of bankruptcy notice – order for substituted service – where payments towards debt made after issue but before service of that Notice – overstatement of amount owed in Notice at time of service – whether the validity of the notice should be tested as at the date of issue – whether there is a duty of full and frank disclosure when making an ex parte application for extension of a bankruptcy notice or making an application for substituted service – duty of candour – abuse of process. |
Bankruptcy Act1966 (Cth) s.41(5)
Re Sterling; ex parte Esanda Pty Ltd (1980) 30 ALR 77
Walsh v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1984) 156 CLR 337
Re Lentini; ex parte Lentini v CSR Ltd (1991) 29 FCR
Coyne v Sun Securities Ltd and Commercial Equity Corporation Ltd and Others (1992) 8 WAR 218
Hayden and Others v Teplitzky and Others (1997) FCA 230, BC9701150
TQM Cargo Logistics Pty Ltd & Ors v Drake (Unreported SCNSW 2 September 1998)
Alexander v Pargiter (1998) 86 FCR 108
Lindholdt v Meritt Madden Printing Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 260
| Applicant: | EUGENE WASILENIA |
| Respondent: | DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION |
| File No: | SZ 1148 of 2002 |
| Delivered on: | 15 January 2003 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Hearing date: | 19 December 2002 |
| Judgment of: | Raphael FM |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr M Churchill |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Mr S Smith |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr A Melrose |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Australian Government Solicitor |
ORDERS
Bankruptcy Notice NN 828 of 2001 be set aside.
The respondent to pay the applicant’s costs pursuant to the Federal Court Rules, to be taxed if not agreed.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SZ 1148 of 2003
| EUGENE WASILENIA |
Applicant
And
| DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The applicant in this case is a barrister who practices in the courts of New South Wales. On the 23 April 1999 the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation recovered judgment against him in the District Court of NSW, by default, in the sum of $61,580.17 including costs.
On 26 June 2000 the Commissioner applied to the Official Receiver of the Bankruptcy District of NSW for the issue of a bankruptcy notice. Notice NN 5216 of 2000 was issued advising Mr Wasilenia (the debtor) that he owed a debt of $68,496.24 which consisted of the original judgment debt together with interest and costs.
Notice NN 5216 of 2000 was not served personally upon the debtor.
In October 2000 the Commissioner received a report from a process server indicating that attempts to serve the debtor were unsuccessful. On 22 January 2001 the notice was extended under sub-regulation 4.02A(2)(b) of the Bankruptcy Regulations until 26 June 2001. On
19 February 2001 a process server left a copy of Notice NN 5216 of 2000 under the door of the debtor’s business address. The…
Continue reading Wasilenia v DCT
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Wasilenia v DCT [2003] FMCA 8
- Case
- [2003] FMCA 8
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining whether the Bankruptcy Notice was validly issued and if the Commissioner of Taxation complied with the necessary statutory requirements. Key issues included whether the notice was properly served, if there was an assessment that formed the basis of the debt, and if the notice contained all the required statutory information. The court also examined the procedural fairness in the notice's issuance.
In examining the evidence and submissions, the court found significant procedural flaws in the notice. The notice was not properly served, and there was no valid assessment to support the debt claimed. Furthermore, the notice lacked certain required statutory information, rendering it defective. The court held that these deficiencies meant the notice was invalid and thus should be set aside. Consequently, the court ordered the notice to be set aside and directed the Commissioner of Taxation to pay Wasilenia's costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Bankruptcy Notice NN 828 of 2001 be set aside.
2.
The respondent to pay the applicant’s costs pursuant to the Federal Court Rules, to be taxed if not agreed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.