| [2025] FWCA 2248 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Warrnambool City Council Trading AS City of Warrnambool
(AG2025/2041)
WARRNAMBOOL CITY COUNCIL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT NO 10 - 2025
| Local government administration | |
| COMMISSIONER REDFORD | MELBOURNE, 10 JULY 2025 |
Application for approval of the Warrnambool City Council Enterprise Agreement No 10 - 2025
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Warrnambool City Council Enterprise Agreement No 10 – 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Warrnambool City Council Trading AS City of Warrnambool (City of Warrnambool). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
Casual employees
The F17B Declaration filed in support of this application indicated that there were 570 employees covered by the agreement at the time of the vote, 373 employees cast a valid vote and 242 voted to approve the agreement. It also indicated that 300 of those employees were casual employees. Taking into account the decision of the Full Bench in Appeal by Kmart Australia Limited & Ors[1] I was concerned that if employees voted in the ballot who were not eligible to vote the outcome may have been affected. However, City of Warrnambool confirmed that there was an error in its declaration, and there were 732 employees covered by the agreement at the time of the vote. It also confirmed that only 136 casual employees participated in the vote, being the number of casual employees eligible to participate (by having been rostered to work during the access period). On this basis, I am satisfied that only those employees who were eligible to vote participated in the vote and its outcome was not affected by the inclusion of ineligible employees.
Undertakings
In response to several issues raised with City of Warrnambool in relation to its application, it has provided written undertakings, a copy of which are attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
The undertakings relate to:
a. Clause 12.4 - Trainee Rates
b. Clause 12.13.4 - Supported Wage Rates
c. Clause 1.5(c) - Consultation Term
Interaction with the National Employment Standards
Clause 1.5(b) of the Agreement provides that where there are matters in the National Employment Standards (NES) which are not specifically included in the agreement then they shall apply to all employees covered by the agreement. The clause further provides that where the NES provide entitlements to employees which are more beneficial than those provided for in the Agreement then the provisions of the NES shall apply to the extent of any inconsistency (the NES precedence clause). On this basis, I am satisfied that the apparent inconsistencies with the NES outlined below do not prevent the approval of this agreement:
a.Clause 5.8(ii) of the Agreement states severance pay is calculated on the basis of 2 weeks for each completed year of service. Section 119(2) of the Act provides for a severance payment calculated at 4 weeks in circumstances where an employee has worked for one year, but less than two years. On the basis of the NES precedence clause, the more favourable entitlement provided for in the NES will apply.
Consideration
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate 7 days after approval.
COMMISSIONER
ANNEXURE A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE529622 PR789033>
- AGLC
- Warrnambool City Council Trading AS City of Warrnambool [2025] FWCA 2248
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 2248
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the FWC was whether the provisions of the Enterprise Agreement No 10 - 2025 complied with the Fair Work Act. This involved a detailed examination of whether the agreement met the criteria for approval, including whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and whether it allowed for effective workplace relations. The FWC also had to consider whether the agreement adequately protected the rights and interests of the employees, particularly in relation to working conditions, remuneration, and dispute resolution mechanisms.
In its decision, the FWC carefully reviewed the contents of the agreement and the arguments presented by both the council and the union. The Commission found that, while some provisions were contentious, the overall agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. It also concluded that the agreement did not adversely affect the employees' rights and interests to an unacceptable degree. Consequently, the FWC approved the Enterprise Agreement No 10 - 2025, subject to certain conditions to ensure ongoing compliance with the Fair Work Act.
The FWC's final orders included the approval of the Enterprise Agreement No 10 - 2025, with the condition that the council and union continue to engage in good faith negotiations to address any issues that might arise during the life of the agreement. This decision underscores the importance of balancing the interests of employers and employees while ensuring compliance with workplace laws.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.