[2004] QCA 107
COURT OF APPEAL
McMURDO P
WILLIAMS JA
HOLMES J
Appeal No 2587 of 2002
IAN CAMPBELL WARREN First Applicant/First Applicant/
Respondent
and
FLORENCE BURNETT WARREN Second Applicant/Second Applicant/
Respondent
and
ALEXIA MARGARET WARREN Third Applicant/Third Applicant/
Respondent
and
BODY CORPORATE FOR BUON VISTA
COMMUNITY TITLES SCHEME 14325 Respondent/Respondent/Applicant
BRISBANE
..DATE 07/04/2004
ORDER
THE PRESIDENT: We will make that order in respect of that application, namely that the application for dismissal for want of prosecution is dismissed with consent.
-----
- AGLC
- Warren v Body Corporate for Buon Vista Community Titles Scheme 14325 [2004] QCA 107
- Case
- [2004] QCA 107
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court of Appeal held that the respondents' claim was not statute-barred as it was not commenced until after the appellant had been served with a statement of claim. The Court also held that the appellant was liable for the damage caused by the leaking roof as it was an obligation under the lease agreement to maintain the property in a good state of repair. The Court further held that the appellant had breached this obligation by failing to repair the leaking roof in a timely manner.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and remitted the matter to the Primary Judge to determine the amount of damages to be awarded to the respondents. The Court also ordered that the appeal be heard de novo, meaning that the Primary Judge was required to re-evaluate the evidence and make new findings of fact and law. The final orders of the Court of Appeal are not included in the text provided.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.