FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Warrabinga-Wiradjuri People #7 v Attorney General of New South Wales [2019] FCA 1177
File number: NSD 857 of 2017
NSD 543 of 2013
NSD 1786 of 2016Judge: GRIFFITHS J Date of judgment: 26 July 2019 Date of publication of reasons 31 July 2019 Date of hearing: 23 July 2019 Date of last submissions: 26 July 2019 Registry: New South Wales Division: General Division National Practice Area: Native Title Category: No Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 9 Solicitor for the Applicants: Mr S Blackshield of Blackshield Lawyers Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Ms S Davis of Australian Government Solicitor Counsel for the Tenth Respondent: The 10th respondent appeared in person Counsel for the Twelfth Respondent: The 12th respondent appeared in person by telephone Counsel for the Thirteenth Respondent: The 13th respondent appeared in person Counsel for the Sixteenth Respondent: The 16th respondent appeared in person by telephone Counsel for the Seventeenth Respondent: The 17th respondent appeared in person by telephone Solicitor for the 32nd Respondent: Mr D Schultz of NSWLAC Solicitor for the 33rd Respondent: Ms M Holt of NTSCORP Limited Counsel for the 34th Respondent: The 34th respondent appeared in person by telephone Counsel for the 35th Respondent: The 35th respondent appeared in person by telephone Solicitor for the 69th Respondent: Ms K Perincek of DLA Piper Australia Counsel for the 101st Respondent: The 101st respondent appeared in person ORDERS
NSD 857 of 2017
NSD 543 of 2013
NSD 1786 of 2016BETWEEN: WARRABINGA-WIRADJURI PEOPLE #7
First Applicant
WARRABINGA-WIRADJURI PEOPLE #2
Second Applicant
WARRABINGA-WIRADJURI PEOPLE #6
Third Applicant
AND: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW SOUTH WALES (and others named in the Schedule)
First Respondent
JUDGE:
GRIFFITHS J
DATE OF ORDER:
26 JULY 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Lithgow City Council be joined as a party to the proceedings under s 84(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
2.Pursuant to section 86B(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), this matter is referred for further mediation between the applicant, NTSCORP Limited and the active Indigenous Respondents by a Registrar of the Court.
3.The further mediation is to be commence by 16 September 2019 and conclude by 21 November 2019.
4.The Registrar is to provide a mediation report to the Court by 22 November 2019.
5.The applicant to file a progress report by 4 December 2019.
6.The matter is to be listed case management hearing on 11 December 2019.
7.The parties have liberty to restore on 48 hours’ notice.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
GRIFFITHS J:
These three matters were listed for a case management hearing on 23 July 2019. Technical difficulties created by the number of parties appearing by telephone at the same time caused the hearing to be terminated.
Later that day, the parties were contacted by the Registry and told that, in order to avoid unnecessary future expense by having a further case management hearing, the Court was minded to make proposed orders joining Lithgow City Council as a party to the proceeding and also making orders for the three matters to proceed to a further mediation.
The parties were invited to file and serve a written outline of submissions in opposition to the proposed joinder order and/or proposed orders concerning a further mediation.
No opposition was expressed to the making of the joinder order. The Court is satisfied, based on the affidavit dated 1 May 2019 of Graeme Faulkner that the Council’s interests may be affected. Based on Mr Faulkner’s affidavit, the Court is satisfied that it is in the interests of justice that Lithgow City Council be joined as a party in the proceeding.
The second part of the scheduled case management hearing related to the issue whether the three proceedings should be referred for further mediation between the applicant, NTSCORP Limited and the active Indigenous Respondents. The Court received proposed minutes of orders to that effect from the applicant and NTSCORP. Mr Reilly, who represents the Ibbai Waggan respondents also notified the Registry that they now have legal representation for the purposes of participating and the mediation.
By an email sent to all parties on the afternoon of 23 July 2019, the Court advised that it was minded to make orders along the lines of the proposed short minutes of order provided by the applicant in preparation for the case management hearing, but it gave an opportunity for anyone to oppose that course by filing a brief written submission before 4:15pm 26 July 2019 as to why the proposed orders should not be made. The parties were advised that the Court would determine the matters on the papers and without a further hearing.
The only person who opposed the making of the proposed orders was Mr Trevor Robinson, who represented himself and was a previously inactive Indigenous Respondent, who wished to become active. He asked that the mediation process be delayed and not begin until 1 November 2019. He said that he wished to call several Wiradjuri nation meetings to discuss the Warrabinga-Wiradjuri claim and to solicit affidavits from the Wiradjuri people regarding these matters. He said that he also wanted to provide the Wiradjuri people with a letter he had written to the Australian National Audit Office regarding what he described as “the abuse of the Native Title Process for financial gain through “phoenix operations”.”
Mr Robinson has not persuaded me that the proposed further mediation process should be delayed. Mr Robinson has between now and 16 September 2019 (the earliest point from which the proposed mediation can commence), to attend to the matters he describes. It is in everyone’s interest that the mediation process not be delayed any further because it has the prospect of narrowing the disputed issues and reducing the scope for costly contested legal proceedings.
Conclusion
For these reasons, an order will be made joining Lithgow City Council as a respondent in the proceeding and orders will be made in relation to the proposed mediation.
I certify that the preceding nine (9) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Griffiths. Associate:
Dated: 31 July 2019
SCHEDULE OF PARTIES
NSD 857 of 2017
NSD 543 of 2013
NSD 1786 of 2016
First Applicant WENDY LEWIS Second Applicant MAVIS AGNEW Third Applicant
MARTIN DELAUNEY
Applicant
WARRABINGA-WIRADJURI #7
Second Respondent
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Third Respondent
BLUE MOUNTAINS CITY COUNCIL
Fourth Respondent
MID-WESTERN REGIONAL COUNCIL
Fifth Respondent
DINAWAN DYRRIBANG UNCLE BILL ALLEN JR
Sixth Respondent
LLOYD ATKINSON
Seventh Respondent
EMMA MAY GRACE ATTKINS
Eighth Respondent
BATHURST LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL
Ninth Respondent
JUDY BELL
Tenth Respondent
BRADLEY ROBERT BLISS
Eleventh Respondent
PAUL WILLIAM BRYDON
Twelfth Respondent
KIM MAY BURKE
Thirteenth Respondent
WAYNE ALFRED CARR
Fourteenth Respondent
ISABEL COE
Fifteenth Respondent
LESLIE JOHN COE
Sixteenth Respondent
LYNDA-JUNE COE
Seventeenth Respondent
BRENDON JOHN COOK
Eighteenth Respondent
HAYDON THOMAS CROOK
Nineteenth Respondent
DEERUBBIN LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL
Twentieth Respondent
YANHADARRAMBAL JADE WILLIAM FLYNN
Twenty First Respondent
BRIAN GRANT
Twenty Second Respondent
PETA SUSAN HOLMES
Twenty Third Respondent
KEITH KEMP
Twenty Fourth Respondent
KERRIE LEE LEWIS
Twenty Fifth Respondent
KEVIN SAMUEL MAYS
Twenty Sixth Respondent
KACIE MITCHELL
Twenty Seventh Respondent
MUDGEE LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL
Twenty Eighth Respondent
CLINTON NIX
Twenty Ninth Respondent
JAYLA NIX
Thirtieth Respondent
PAMELA NIX
Thirty First Respondent
ZAC NIX
Thirty Second Respondent
NSW ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL
Thirty Third Respondent
NTSCORP LIMITED
Thirty Fourth Respondent
JOHN THOMAS RILEY
Thirty Fifth Respondent
TREVOR ROBINSON
Thirty Sixth Respondent
ALEXANDRA MAREE ROSS
Thirty Seventh Respondent
CASSANDRA JAYNE ROSS
Thirty Eighth Respondent
SANDRA MAREE ROSS
Thirty Ninth Respondent
ZACHARY JOHN HENDERSON ROSS
Fortieth Respondent
GREGORY JOHN SMITH
Forty First Respondent
JASON SMITH
Forty Second Respondent
KAREN SMITH
Forty Third Respondent
NATLY SMITH
Forty Fourth Respondent
PATRICIA SMITH
Forty Fifth Respondent
ROBERT SMITH
Forty Sixth Respondent
STEPHEN SMITH
Forty Seventh Respondent
LATOYA TERRY
Forty Eighth Respondent
STEPHANIE TERRY
Forty Ninth Respondent
NORMA MARY THOMAS
Fiftieth Respondent
WANARUAH LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL
Fifty First Respondent
WELLINGTON VALLEY WIRADJURI ABORIGINAL CORPORATION
Fifty Second Respondent
BRETT JAMES WHYMAN
Fifty Third Respondent
DOROTHY FAY WHYMAN
Fifty Fourth Respondent
EDWARD CHARLES WHYMAN
Fifty Fifth Respondent
ROBERT HEWITT WHYMAN
Fifty Sixth Respondent
VANESSA FAY WHYMAN
Fifty Seventh Respondent
PETER HOWARD WIGHTON
Fifty Eighth Respondent
AARON JAMES WILLIAMS
Fifty Ninth Respondent
DALLAS JOHN WILLIAMS
Sixtieth Respondent
TAYLAH JADE WILLIAMS
Sixty First Respondent
TYSON JAMES WILLIAMS
Sixty Second Respondent
ZACHERY AARON WILLIAMS
Sixty Third Respondent
BIANCA JADE WILSON
Sixty Fourth Respondent
DANE JOSEPH WILSON
Sixty Fifth Respondent
DYLAN JAY WILSON
Sixty Sixth Respondent
KYLE JAMES WILSON
Sixty Seventh Respondent
VANESSA ELIZABETH WILSON
Sixty Eighth Respondent
RUSSELL KEITH DICKENS
Sixty Ninth Respondent
EMIRATES HOTELS (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED ACN 113 608 414
Seventieth Respondent
GREGORY LYLE HUNDY
Seventy First Respondent
JAMES WILLIAM EDWARD WALKER
Seventy Second Respondent
WARRUMBUNGLE SHIRE COUNCIL
Seventy Third Respondent
CENTENNIAL AIRLY PTY LIMITED ACN 078 693 722
Seventy Fourth Respondent
SHOALHAVEN COAL PTY LTD
Seventy Fifth Respondent
SITEGOAL PTY LTD
Seventy Sixth Respondent
WALKER QUARRIES PTY LTD
Seventy Seventh Respondent
JAMES BALLAS
Seventy Eighth Respondent
ANNE MARGARET BLAMEY
Seventy Ninth Respondent
CHRISTOPHER JOHN BLAMEY
Eightieth Respondent
LIONEL BRAITHWAITE
Eighty First Respondent
WILLIAM ARTHUR BROWN
Eighty Second Respondent
JANE BURSILL
Eighty Third Respondent
DAVID LEE CLARKE OF PH CLARKE & SON
Eighty Fourth Respondent
LEIGH JOHN DESREAUX
Eighty Fifth Respondent
HEATHER GEORGE
Eighty Sixth Respondent
ANTHONY GIBSON
Eighty Seventh Respondent
PETER RONALD GRIEVE
Eighty Eighth Respondent
ALAN LOVELL HEATH
Eighty Ninth Respondent
KD FOLPP P/L
Ninetieth Respondent
RACHELLE MCMAHON
Ninety First Respondent
RONALD CHARLES MILTON
Ninety Second Respondent
HENRY WILLIAM PEARCE
Ninety Third Respondent
LINDSEY PIGGOTT
Ninety Fourth Respondent
JOYCE MILDRED PURTLE
Ninety Fifth Respondent
GREGORY JAMES ROHR
Ninety Sixth Respondent
TIMOTHY JOHN ROHR
Ninety Seventh Respondent
DIANA LUCY RUTTER
Ninety Eighth Respondent
KEITH LAWRENCE RUTTER
Ninety Ninth Respondent
PAULYNE MAY SANDER
One Hundredth Respondent
ROBYN PEARL SMITH
One Hundred First Respondent
SALVATORE SPANO
One Hundred Second Respondent
AMANDA CAROLINE SEE STEWART
One Hundred Third Respondent
GAY SUMMERS
One Hundred Fourth Respondent
SUNTALA PTY LTD
One Hundred Fifth Respondent
MICHAEL ANDREW SUTTOR
One Hundred Sixth Respondent
ALLAN ALBERT WALES
One Hundred Seventh Respondent
WIDDEN STUD PTY LTD
One Hundred Eighth
RYLSTONE KANDOS ANGLERS CLUB INC
Respondent
One Hundred Ninth Respondent
WALLERAWANG BRANCH OF THE CENTRAL ACCLIMATISATION SOCIETY
One Hundred Tenth Respondent
AUSTRALIAN RAIL TRACK CORPORATION ACN 081 455 754
One Hundred Eleventh Respondent
TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED ABN 33 051 775 556
One Hundred Twelfth Respondent
NSW ELECTRICITY NETWORKS OPERATIONS PTY LTD AS TRUSTEE FOR THE NSW ELECTRICITY NETWORKS OPERATIONS TRUST ACN 609 169 959 (TRANSGRID)
One Hundred Thirteenth Respondent
COOYAL PARK RESERVE TRUST R120102
One Hundred Fourteenth Respondent
DUNEDOO SHOWGROUND TRUST RESERVE NO R83113
One Hundred Fifteenth Respondent
OLINDA PUBLIC RECREATION RESERVE TRUST
One Hundred Sixteenth Respondent
EVELYN MARGARET WATSON
ASSISTED DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Applicant WENDY LEWIS Applicant
MAVIS AGNEW
Applicant
MARTIN DELAUNEY
Applicant
WARRABINGA-WIRADJURI #7
Respondent
KEITH KEMP
Respondent
BRADLEY ROBERT BLISS
Respondent
JOHN THOMAS RILEY
Respondent
WAYNE ALFRED CARR
Respondent
WELLINGTON VALLEY WIRADJURI ABORIGINAL CORPORATION
- AGLC
- Warrabinga-Wiradjuri People #7 v Attorney General of New South Wales [2019] FCA 1177
- Case
- [2019] FCA 1177
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were whether Lithgow City Council should be joined as a respondent in the proceedings and whether the proposed mediation process should proceed as planned. The court had to consider the potential benefits of mediation in resolving the dispute, as well as the implications for the parties if the mediation process were to be delayed. Additionally, the court had to assess the merits of the applicant's arguments against the proposed mediation timeline.
In reaching its decision, the court held that it was in the interest of all parties to proceed with the mediation process, as it could potentially narrow the disputed issues and reduce the need for extensive and costly litigation. The court ruled that Lithgow City Council should be joined as a respondent, finding that its involvement was necessary to address the comprehensive scope of the native title claim. The court also determined that the mediation process should not be delayed and set a timeline for its commencement and conclusion, with the Registrar to provide a report to the Court. Furthermore, the court mandated a series of subsequent procedural steps, including a progress report and a case management hearing, to ensure the mediation process and the broader proceedings remained on track.
The orders made by the court include the joining of Lithgow City Council as a party respondent, the referral of the matter to further mediation, the establishment of a mediation timeline, the requirement for a mediation report, the filing of a progress report by the applicant, and the scheduling of a case management hearing. The parties retain the liberty to restore the matter on short notice, ensuring flexibility in the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Lithgow City Council be joined as a party to the proceedings under s 84(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
2. Pursuant to section 86B(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), this matter is referred for further mediation between the applicant, NTSCORP Limited and the active Indigenous Respondents by a Registrar of the Court.
3. The further mediation is to be commence by 16 September 2019 and conclude by 21 November 2019.
4. The Registrar is to provide a mediation report to the Court by 22 November 2019.
5. The applicant to file a progress report by 4 December 2019.
6. The matter is to be listed case management hearing on 11 December 2019.
7. The parties have liberty to restore on 48 hours’ notice.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.